An Empirical Equilibrium Model of Formal and Informal Credit Markets in Developing Countries

Fan Wang
{"title":"An Empirical Equilibrium Model of Formal and Informal Credit Markets in Developing Countries","authors":"Fan Wang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3316939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I develop and estimate a dynamic equilibrium model of household borrowing and savings decisions in formal and informal credit markets. The model features households with heterogeneities in productivity and wealth, and characterizes credit market access by interest rates, fixed costs, and borrowing constraints. Households have access to an exogenous formal credit market and to an informal credit market in which the interest rate is endogenously determined by the local demand and supply of credit. My application focuses on Thailand which implemented policies in 2001 that primarily encouraged borrowing. I estimate the model by simulated maximum likelihood using data from the Townsend Thai Monthly Survey. Based on the estimated model, I find that lower fixed costs increased the proportion of households borrowing formally, and that relaxed formal borrowing collateral constraints lowered informal interest rates. In terms of welfare, I find that low wealth but productive households benefited from Thai policies to expand credit access, but the gains were smaller than suggested by previous studies that ignored the informal market. Moreover, approximately 18% of households suffered welfare losses because of diminished opportunities for informal saving. Counterfactual policy simulations suggest that policies that combine borrowing and savings subsidies could yield higher average social welfare at a cost similar to the implemented policies.","PeriodicalId":346619,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Computable General Equilibrium Models (Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Computable General Equilibrium Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3316939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In this paper, I develop and estimate a dynamic equilibrium model of household borrowing and savings decisions in formal and informal credit markets. The model features households with heterogeneities in productivity and wealth, and characterizes credit market access by interest rates, fixed costs, and borrowing constraints. Households have access to an exogenous formal credit market and to an informal credit market in which the interest rate is endogenously determined by the local demand and supply of credit. My application focuses on Thailand which implemented policies in 2001 that primarily encouraged borrowing. I estimate the model by simulated maximum likelihood using data from the Townsend Thai Monthly Survey. Based on the estimated model, I find that lower fixed costs increased the proportion of households borrowing formally, and that relaxed formal borrowing collateral constraints lowered informal interest rates. In terms of welfare, I find that low wealth but productive households benefited from Thai policies to expand credit access, but the gains were smaller than suggested by previous studies that ignored the informal market. Moreover, approximately 18% of households suffered welfare losses because of diminished opportunities for informal saving. Counterfactual policy simulations suggest that policies that combine borrowing and savings subsidies could yield higher average social welfare at a cost similar to the implemented policies.
发展中国家正规和非正规信贷市场的实证均衡模型
在本文中,我开发和估计了一个动态均衡模型的家庭借贷和储蓄决策在正式和非正式信贷市场。该模型以生产率和财富异质性的家庭为特征,并通过利率、固定成本和借贷约束来表征信贷市场准入。家庭可以进入外生的正规信贷市场,也可以进入利率由当地信贷需求和供给内生决定的非正规信贷市场。我的申请重点关注泰国,该国在2001年实施了主要鼓励借贷的政策。我使用汤森泰国月度调查的数据通过模拟最大似然来估计模型。根据估算模型,我发现固定成本的降低增加了家庭正式借贷的比例,而正式借贷抵押品限制的放松降低了非正式利率。在福利方面,我发现低财富但有生产力的家庭从泰国扩大信贷渠道的政策中受益,但收益比之前忽视非正式市场的研究所表明的要小。此外,大约18%的家庭因非正式储蓄机会减少而遭受福利损失。反事实政策模拟表明,结合借贷和储蓄补贴的政策可以产生更高的平均社会福利,其成本与实施的政策相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信