Passport to neoliberal normality? A critical exploration of COVID-19 vaccine passports.

L. Telford, M. Bushell, Owen Hodgkinson
{"title":"Passport to neoliberal normality? A critical exploration of COVID-19 vaccine passports.","authors":"L. Telford, M. Bushell, Owen Hodgkinson","doi":"10.19164/jcche.v2i1.1224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic governments across the world including in France, Canada, Lithuania, Austria, Italy, and Ireland imposed ‘vaccine passports’ on the premise that they would curtail transmission of the virus, reduce COVID-19 related mortalities, and enable society to return to neoliberal normality. However, vaccine passports raise several important and troubling issues that have not been given sufficient attention within the social sciences. Therefore, this article offers a critique of vaccine passports. It is structured into three key themes: (a) scientifically and ethically problematic, (b) the death of the social and the ‘Other’, and (c) digital surveillance and freedom. The article begins by exploring how vaccine passports make little scientific sense and further entrench some unvaccinated peoples’ sense of political and medical mistrust. It then discusses how they amplify social divisions, creating the unvaccinated Other in society and intensifying the neoliberal shift towards a post-social, contactless world. The paper closes with an outline of how vaccine passports were cast as enabling a return to neoliberal normality and freedom, hinging upon an assumption of harmlessness while cementing the negative ideology of capitalist realism.","PeriodicalId":192918,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Crime, Harm, and Ethics","volume":"226 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Crime, Harm, and Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19164/jcche.v2i1.1224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic governments across the world including in France, Canada, Lithuania, Austria, Italy, and Ireland imposed ‘vaccine passports’ on the premise that they would curtail transmission of the virus, reduce COVID-19 related mortalities, and enable society to return to neoliberal normality. However, vaccine passports raise several important and troubling issues that have not been given sufficient attention within the social sciences. Therefore, this article offers a critique of vaccine passports. It is structured into three key themes: (a) scientifically and ethically problematic, (b) the death of the social and the ‘Other’, and (c) digital surveillance and freedom. The article begins by exploring how vaccine passports make little scientific sense and further entrench some unvaccinated peoples’ sense of political and medical mistrust. It then discusses how they amplify social divisions, creating the unvaccinated Other in society and intensifying the neoliberal shift towards a post-social, contactless world. The paper closes with an outline of how vaccine passports were cast as enabling a return to neoliberal normality and freedom, hinging upon an assumption of harmlessness while cementing the negative ideology of capitalist realism.
新自由主义常态的通行证?COVID-19疫苗护照的关键探索。
在新冠肺炎大流行期间,法国、加拿大、立陶宛、奥地利、意大利、爱尔兰等世界各国政府以减少病毒传播、减少与新冠肺炎相关的死亡率、使社会回归新自由主义常态为前提,实施了“疫苗护照”。然而,疫苗护照提出了几个重要而令人不安的问题,这些问题在社会科学领域没有得到足够的重视。因此,本文对疫苗护照提出了批评。它分为三个关键主题:(a)科学和伦理问题,(b)社会和“他者”的死亡,以及(c)数字监控和自由。这篇文章首先探讨了疫苗护照是如何没有科学意义的,并进一步加深了一些未接种疫苗的人对政治和医学的不信任。然后讨论了它们如何扩大社会分裂,在社会中创造未接种疫苗的他者,并加剧新自由主义向后社会、无接触世界的转变。论文最后概述了疫苗护照是如何被塑造成能够回归新自由主义常态和自由的,依赖于无害的假设,同时巩固了资本主义现实主义的消极意识形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书