Implementation of the principle of equality and guarantee of the rights of convicted persons

O. A. Adoyevskaya
{"title":"Implementation of the principle of equality and guarantee of the rights of convicted persons","authors":"O. A. Adoyevskaya","doi":"10.18287/2542-047x-2021-7-3-25-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the problems of implementing the universally recognized principle of equality in penal enforcement policy and guaranteeing the rights of convicts, as well as suspects accused of committing crimes in custody. The fundamental rights of convicted and detained persons are analyzed. It is proved that not all fundamental rights of convicted and detained persons are guaranteed by law in accordance with the principle of equality, which is among the universally recognized principles of international law and is aimed at international legal protection against discrimination. It is proved that the penal enforcement legislation does not provide for legislative restrictions guaranteeing protection against discrimination on any grounds. In the case of convicted and detained persons, there are often inequalities in gender, age, property and legal aid. Now an opportunity to serve prison term concerning women and minors at the place of residence as it is provided for men isn't enshrined in the criminal and executive legislation. Such a legislative decision contributes to the severance of family and socio-useful ties among convicted women and minors. The prohibition of the use of technical means by lawyers in the territory of a correctional institution is discriminatory, since it infringes on the right of convicts to receive qualified legal assistance, guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The article shows the differences in penal policy between the haves and the poor, which is also classically discriminatory and unacceptable. It was concluded that the implementation of universally recognized principles of international law, including the principle of equality of citizens before the law and the court, is the responsibility of the legislative and law enforcement agencies and contributes to the achievement of the goals of criminal enforcement legislation, as well as to strengthening citizens' faith in the institutions of State power.","PeriodicalId":406056,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Journal of Samara University","volume":"266 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Journal of Samara University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047x-2021-7-3-25-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the problems of implementing the universally recognized principle of equality in penal enforcement policy and guaranteeing the rights of convicts, as well as suspects accused of committing crimes in custody. The fundamental rights of convicted and detained persons are analyzed. It is proved that not all fundamental rights of convicted and detained persons are guaranteed by law in accordance with the principle of equality, which is among the universally recognized principles of international law and is aimed at international legal protection against discrimination. It is proved that the penal enforcement legislation does not provide for legislative restrictions guaranteeing protection against discrimination on any grounds. In the case of convicted and detained persons, there are often inequalities in gender, age, property and legal aid. Now an opportunity to serve prison term concerning women and minors at the place of residence as it is provided for men isn't enshrined in the criminal and executive legislation. Such a legislative decision contributes to the severance of family and socio-useful ties among convicted women and minors. The prohibition of the use of technical means by lawyers in the territory of a correctional institution is discriminatory, since it infringes on the right of convicts to receive qualified legal assistance, guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The article shows the differences in penal policy between the haves and the poor, which is also classically discriminatory and unacceptable. It was concluded that the implementation of universally recognized principles of international law, including the principle of equality of citizens before the law and the court, is the responsibility of the legislative and law enforcement agencies and contributes to the achievement of the goals of criminal enforcement legislation, as well as to strengthening citizens' faith in the institutions of State power.
落实被判刑人权利平等和保障原则
本文论述了在刑事执行政策中落实普遍公认的平等原则,保障在押罪犯和被控犯罪嫌疑人的权利等问题。分析了被定罪者和被拘留者的基本权利。事实证明,并不是所有被定罪和被拘留者的基本权利都根据平等原则得到法律保障。平等原则是公认的国际法原则之一,其目的是为不受歧视提供国际法律保护。事实证明,刑事执法立法没有规定保障不受任何理由歧视的立法限制。就被定罪和被拘留者而言,往往在性别、年龄、财产和法律援助方面存在不平等。现在关于妇女和未成年人在居住地服刑的机会就像为男性提供的那样并没有被写入刑事和行政立法。这种立法决定有助于断绝被定罪妇女和未成年人之间的家庭和社会有用关系。禁止律师在教养机构的领土内使用技术手段是歧视性的,因为它侵犯了俄罗斯联邦宪法所保障的罪犯获得合格法律援助的权利。文章显示了富人和穷人在刑罚政策上的差异,这也是典型的歧视和不可接受的。会议的结论是,执行普遍承认的国际法原则,包括公民在法律和法院面前平等的原则,是立法和执法机构的责任,并有助于实现刑事执法立法的目标,以及加强公民对国家权力机构的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信