A Study on the Attitude of Healthcare Professionals Towards Quality Accreditation

K. Rawal, Nishtha Pareek
{"title":"A Study on the Attitude of Healthcare Professionals Towards Quality Accreditation","authors":"K. Rawal, Nishtha Pareek","doi":"10.21567/adhyayan.v12i2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accreditation of hospitals is considered one of the most relevant mechanisms to achieve improvement in the quality and safety of healthcare (8). Worldwide, accreditation is gaining popularity as an effective mechanism for external assessment of healthcare quality. It is considered a method to address the issue of healthcare quality and safety. Accreditation is the independent and systematic assessment of a hospital against defined standards and recognition of a certain level of achievements of those standards by an external body. It is a process of certifying the credibility of an organization. In healthcare, accreditation recognizes and certifies the capability of a healthcare organization in delivering an acceptable standard of healthcare services, which is based upon excellent and safe practices. In this study, healthcare professionals' attitude toward quality accreditation is examined to know about their accountability. Total of 604 healthcare professionals such as; consultant physicians/surgeons, duty doctors, nursing staff, paramedical staff/allied healthcare staff, hospital administrators/managers, others (housekeeping in-charge/blue collar employees and healthcare academicians from public, private and run by Trust located in the North and Central India were randomly chosen. Through the application of factor analysis two components are explored, i.e., service quality and adaptability. One way of ANOVA was applied and found that a difference among the categories of healthcare professionals is observed for these components.","PeriodicalId":228193,"journal":{"name":"Adhyayan: A Journal of Management Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adhyayan: A Journal of Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21567/adhyayan.v12i2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accreditation of hospitals is considered one of the most relevant mechanisms to achieve improvement in the quality and safety of healthcare (8). Worldwide, accreditation is gaining popularity as an effective mechanism for external assessment of healthcare quality. It is considered a method to address the issue of healthcare quality and safety. Accreditation is the independent and systematic assessment of a hospital against defined standards and recognition of a certain level of achievements of those standards by an external body. It is a process of certifying the credibility of an organization. In healthcare, accreditation recognizes and certifies the capability of a healthcare organization in delivering an acceptable standard of healthcare services, which is based upon excellent and safe practices. In this study, healthcare professionals' attitude toward quality accreditation is examined to know about their accountability. Total of 604 healthcare professionals such as; consultant physicians/surgeons, duty doctors, nursing staff, paramedical staff/allied healthcare staff, hospital administrators/managers, others (housekeeping in-charge/blue collar employees and healthcare academicians from public, private and run by Trust located in the North and Central India were randomly chosen. Through the application of factor analysis two components are explored, i.e., service quality and adaptability. One way of ANOVA was applied and found that a difference among the categories of healthcare professionals is observed for these components.
医疗保健专业人员对质量认证的态度研究
医院的认证被认为是实现医疗质量和安全改善的最相关机制之一(8)。在世界范围内,认证作为一种有效的医疗质量外部评估机制越来越受欢迎。它被认为是解决医疗保健质量和安全问题的一种方法。认证是根据确定的标准对医院进行独立和系统的评估,并由外部机构对达到这些标准的一定程度的成就进行认可。这是一个证明组织信誉的过程。在医疗保健领域,认证是对医疗保健机构提供可接受的医疗保健服务标准的能力的认可和证明,这种标准是基于优秀和安全的实践。在本研究中,医疗保健专业人员对质量认证的态度进行了检查,以了解他们的责任。共有604名医护专业人员,例如;随机选择了来自印度北部和中部的公立、私立和信托机构的咨询医师/外科医生、值班医生、护理人员、辅助医务人员/联合医疗保健人员、医院行政人员/经理、其他人员(家政主管/蓝领员工和医疗保健院士)。通过因子分析的应用,探讨了服务质量和适应性两个组成部分。应用方差分析的一种方法,发现在医疗保健专业人员的类别之间存在差异,观察到这些成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信