Shared decision-making for gene therapy in haemophilia care

Simon Fletcher, Kathryn Jenner, K. Khair
{"title":"Shared decision-making for gene therapy in haemophilia care","authors":"Simon Fletcher, Kathryn Jenner, K. Khair","doi":"10.2478/jhp-2023-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Shared decision-making (SDM) is an important part of patient-centred care in which healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients/caregivers jointly reach care decisions through a two-way exchange and synthesis of information based on clinical evidence and patient preference. SDM was described in haemophilia care in 2014 as two-sided intervention to aid patient decision-making. However, as the range of haemophilia treatments has expanded, identifying the optimal haemophilia treatment for an individual has become more complex. This is particularly so in the case of gene therapy, a onetime-only, irreversible treatment. In this context, it is vital that people with haemophilia (PwH) and their families continue to be involved in care decisions in an informed and interactive way. For gene therapy, this must include being well informed about the gene therapy process, enabling the patient to engage in fully informed SDM and consent, and ensuring that issues around long-term durability, potential side effects, the need for long-term follow-up are understood with a recognition that the ‘unknown unknowns’ are also unknown to HCPs. Both HCPs and patient organisations have a key role to play in providing PwH with access to relevant information and education, tailored to individual needs and free of jargon. Considerable education and support are required before PwH can make a truly informed decision about having gene therapy. Use of structured SDM tools such as the SHARE approach can help to support this. There is a need for SDM educational tools that include written/visual information and the use of standardised checklists may be helpful for both PwH and HCPs. The most important part of this process is that PwH want to undergo gene therapy – and this is only an option if they are fully educated and informed by fully educated and informed healthcare teams.","PeriodicalId":372940,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jhp-2023-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Shared decision-making (SDM) is an important part of patient-centred care in which healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients/caregivers jointly reach care decisions through a two-way exchange and synthesis of information based on clinical evidence and patient preference. SDM was described in haemophilia care in 2014 as two-sided intervention to aid patient decision-making. However, as the range of haemophilia treatments has expanded, identifying the optimal haemophilia treatment for an individual has become more complex. This is particularly so in the case of gene therapy, a onetime-only, irreversible treatment. In this context, it is vital that people with haemophilia (PwH) and their families continue to be involved in care decisions in an informed and interactive way. For gene therapy, this must include being well informed about the gene therapy process, enabling the patient to engage in fully informed SDM and consent, and ensuring that issues around long-term durability, potential side effects, the need for long-term follow-up are understood with a recognition that the ‘unknown unknowns’ are also unknown to HCPs. Both HCPs and patient organisations have a key role to play in providing PwH with access to relevant information and education, tailored to individual needs and free of jargon. Considerable education and support are required before PwH can make a truly informed decision about having gene therapy. Use of structured SDM tools such as the SHARE approach can help to support this. There is a need for SDM educational tools that include written/visual information and the use of standardised checklists may be helpful for both PwH and HCPs. The most important part of this process is that PwH want to undergo gene therapy – and this is only an option if they are fully educated and informed by fully educated and informed healthcare teams.
基因治疗在血友病护理中的共同决策
共享决策(Shared decision, SDM)是以患者为中心的护理的重要组成部分,在该过程中,医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)和患者/护理人员通过基于临床证据和患者偏好的双向信息交换和综合,共同达成护理决策。2014年,SDM在血友病护理中被描述为辅助患者决策的双边干预。然而,随着血友病治疗范围的扩大,为个体确定最佳的血友病治疗变得更加复杂。基因治疗是一种一次性的、不可逆的治疗,尤其如此。在这种情况下,血友病患者及其家属继续以知情和互动的方式参与护理决策至关重要。对于基因治疗,这必须包括充分了解基因治疗过程,使患者能够充分知情地参与SDM和同意,并确保了解长期持久性、潜在副作用、长期随访的必要性等问题,并认识到“未知的未知”对HCPs来说也是未知的。医护人员和患者组织在为PwH提供相关信息和教育方面都发挥着关键作用,这些信息和教育是根据个人需求量身定制的,并且没有术语。在PwH做出关于基因治疗的真正明智的决定之前,需要大量的教育和支持。使用结构化SDM工具(如SHARE方法)可以帮助支持这一点。需要SDM教育工具,包括书面/视觉信息,使用标准化检查清单可能对PwH和hcp都有帮助。这个过程中最重要的部分是,PwH想要接受基因治疗——这只有在他们得到充分教育和充分了解的医疗团队的全面教育和知情的情况下才有可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信