ABOUT THE NEED TO USE THE NOTIONS “HERITOLOGY” AND “MNEMOSOPHY” IN THE TERMINOLOGY OF MUSEUMS

Ilze Knoka
{"title":"ABOUT THE NEED TO USE THE NOTIONS “HERITOLOGY” AND “MNEMOSOPHY” IN THE TERMINOLOGY OF MUSEUMS","authors":"Ilze Knoka","doi":"10.55877/cc.vol6.255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over a period of three decades the Croatian museologist Tomis- lav Šola has offered two neologisms to denote the sector of museums and heri- tage and their respective theory: heritology andmnemosophy. The new terms characterise Šola’s interpretation and priority issues of the sector in their own way, at the same time they arouse theoretical discussions about the borders of the sector and the need to address the theory of heritage from a wider per- spective than it is applied in practice. In accordance with Šola’s critical atti- tude towards the sector and people working in this sector, the implementation of neologisms in practice encounters mistrust and doubt of professionals working in the area of heritage. This article discloses the origin of these terms, their contribution to the sector ’s theoretical basis and the reasons for their slow inclusion in the dictionary of the sector.","PeriodicalId":333506,"journal":{"name":"Culture Crossroads","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Crossroads","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol6.255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over a period of three decades the Croatian museologist Tomis- lav Šola has offered two neologisms to denote the sector of museums and heri- tage and their respective theory: heritology andmnemosophy. The new terms characterise Šola’s interpretation and priority issues of the sector in their own way, at the same time they arouse theoretical discussions about the borders of the sector and the need to address the theory of heritage from a wider per- spective than it is applied in practice. In accordance with Šola’s critical atti- tude towards the sector and people working in this sector, the implementation of neologisms in practice encounters mistrust and doubt of professionals working in the area of heritage. This article discloses the origin of these terms, their contribution to the sector ’s theoretical basis and the reasons for their slow inclusion in the dictionary of the sector.
关于在博物馆术语中使用“遗产学”和“记忆学”概念的必要性
在过去的三十年里,克罗地亚博物馆学家Tomis- lav Šola提出了两个新词来表示博物馆和遗产及其各自的理论:遗产学(heritology)和遗产学(mnemosophy)。新术语以自己的方式描述了Šola对该部门的解释和优先问题,同时它们引发了关于该部门边界的理论讨论,以及从更广泛的角度解决遗产理论的必要性,而不是在实践中应用。根据Šola对该部门和在该部门工作的人的批判态度,在实践中实施新词会遇到在遗产领域工作的专业人士的不信任和怀疑。本文揭示了这些术语的起源,它们对行业理论基础的贡献,以及它们被缓慢纳入行业词典的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信