Undertaking Material and Technical Activities by Public Administration Bodies and the Right of an Individual to Be Heard

Jakub Szremski
{"title":"Undertaking Material and Technical Activities by Public Administration Bodies and the Right of an Individual to Be Heard","authors":"Jakub Szremski","doi":"10.17951/ppa.2020.3.189-200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right of the individual to be heard is a principle that relates to both the right to a fair trial and the right to a trial. The adjudicating entity is required, regardless of whether it is a court or a public administration body, to enable the active participation of the entity in the proceedings. The right of an individual to be heard in the context of administrative law relates mainly to the procedural situation of a party to administrative proceedings. In jurisdictional administrative proceedings, a party is guaranteed a number of procedural tools to protect its rights. First of all, the party has the opportunity to actively participate in the ongoing administrative process. Provisions of administrative procedural law allow for the submission of evidence applications, explanations, participation in the taking of evidence, as well as access to the files of a pending administrative case. The right of the individual to be heard to a limited extent should also apply to material and technical activities. An individual should be guaranteed at least minimal procedural protection in a situation where administrative bodies perform material and technical activities directly affecting their legal situation.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/ppa.2020.3.189-200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The right of the individual to be heard is a principle that relates to both the right to a fair trial and the right to a trial. The adjudicating entity is required, regardless of whether it is a court or a public administration body, to enable the active participation of the entity in the proceedings. The right of an individual to be heard in the context of administrative law relates mainly to the procedural situation of a party to administrative proceedings. In jurisdictional administrative proceedings, a party is guaranteed a number of procedural tools to protect its rights. First of all, the party has the opportunity to actively participate in the ongoing administrative process. Provisions of administrative procedural law allow for the submission of evidence applications, explanations, participation in the taking of evidence, as well as access to the files of a pending administrative case. The right of the individual to be heard to a limited extent should also apply to material and technical activities. An individual should be guaranteed at least minimal procedural protection in a situation where administrative bodies perform material and technical activities directly affecting their legal situation.
公共行政机关从事物质技术活动和个人表达意见的权利
个人发表意见的权利是一项原则,它既关系到公平审判的权利,也关系到被审判的权利。裁决实体,无论是法院还是公共行政机构,都必须使该实体能够积极参与诉讼。在行政法的语境中,个人表达意见的权利主要涉及行政诉讼当事人的诉讼情况。在有管辖权的行政诉讼中,保证当事人有若干程序工具来保护其权利。首先,党有机会积极参与正在进行的行政程序。行政诉讼法的规定允许提交证据申请、解释、参与取证以及查阅未决行政案件的档案。个人在有限程度上发表意见的权利也应适用于物质和技术活动。在行政机构从事直接影响到个人法律地位的物质和技术活动的情况下,个人至少应得到最低限度的程序保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信