Prediction of Relative Humidity in a High Elevated Basin of Western Karakoram by Using Different Machine Learning Models

M. Adnan, R. Adnan, Shi-yin Liu, M. Saifullah, Yasir Latif, M. Iqbal
{"title":"Prediction of Relative Humidity in a High Elevated Basin of Western Karakoram by Using Different Machine Learning Models","authors":"M. Adnan, R. Adnan, Shi-yin Liu, M. Saifullah, Yasir Latif, M. Iqbal","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.98226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate and reliable prediction of relative humidity is of great importance in all fields concerning global climate change. The current study has employed Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MARS) and M5 Tree (M5T) models to predict the relative humidity in the Hunza River basin, Pakistan. Both the models provided the best prediction for the input scenario S6 (RHt-1, RHt-2, RHt-3, Tt-1, Tt-2, Tt-3). The statistical analysis displayed that the MARS model provided a better prediction of relative humidity as compared to M5T at all meteorological stations, especially, at Ziarat followed by Khunjerab and Naltar. The values of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2) were (5.98%, 5.43%, and 0.808) for Khunjerab; (6.58%, 5.08%, and 0.806) for Naltar; and (5.86%, 4.97%, 0.815) for Ziarat during the testing of MARS model whereas, the values were (6.14%, 5.56%, and 0.772) for Khunjerab; (6.19%, 5.58% and 0.762) for Naltar and (6.08%, 5.46%, 0.783) for Ziarat during the testing of M5T model. Both the models performed slightly better in training as compared to the testing stage. The current study encourages future research to be conducted at high altitude basins for the prediction of other meteorological variables using machine learning tools.","PeriodicalId":131813,"journal":{"name":"Weather Forecasting [Working Title]","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather Forecasting [Working Title]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.98226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Accurate and reliable prediction of relative humidity is of great importance in all fields concerning global climate change. The current study has employed Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MARS) and M5 Tree (M5T) models to predict the relative humidity in the Hunza River basin, Pakistan. Both the models provided the best prediction for the input scenario S6 (RHt-1, RHt-2, RHt-3, Tt-1, Tt-2, Tt-3). The statistical analysis displayed that the MARS model provided a better prediction of relative humidity as compared to M5T at all meteorological stations, especially, at Ziarat followed by Khunjerab and Naltar. The values of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2) were (5.98%, 5.43%, and 0.808) for Khunjerab; (6.58%, 5.08%, and 0.806) for Naltar; and (5.86%, 4.97%, 0.815) for Ziarat during the testing of MARS model whereas, the values were (6.14%, 5.56%, and 0.772) for Khunjerab; (6.19%, 5.58% and 0.762) for Naltar and (6.08%, 5.46%, 0.783) for Ziarat during the testing of M5T model. Both the models performed slightly better in training as compared to the testing stage. The current study encourages future research to be conducted at high altitude basins for the prediction of other meteorological variables using machine learning tools.
不同机器学习模型对喀喇昆仑西部高架盆地相对湿度的预测
准确可靠的相对湿度预报在全球气候变化的各个领域都具有重要意义。本研究采用多元自适应样条回归(MARS)和M5 Tree (M5T)模型对巴基斯坦罕萨河流域的相对湿度进行了预测。两个模型对输入情景S6 (RHt-1、RHt-2、RHt-3、Tt-1、Tt-2、Tt-3)的预测效果最好。统计分析表明,与M5T相比,MARS模式在所有气象站提供了更好的相对湿度预测,特别是在Ziarat,其次是Khunjerab和Naltar。红其拉甫的均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和决定系数(R2)分别为5.98%、5.43%和0.808;(6.58%, 5.08%, 0.806%);(5.86%, 4.97%, 0.815),而红捷拉甫的值分别为(6.14%,5.56%,0.772);(6.19%, 5.58%, 0.762),(6.08%, 5.46%, 0.783)。两种模型在训练阶段的表现都略好于测试阶段。目前的研究鼓励未来在高海拔盆地进行研究,利用机器学习工具预测其他气象变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信