Dr. Hafiz Muhammad Qasim, Ammara Batool, Muhammad Shafqat Nawaz
{"title":"A CORPUS-BASED STUDY OF CONJUNCTIVE COHESION IN PAKISTANI RESEARCH ARTICLES","authors":"Dr. Hafiz Muhammad Qasim, Ammara Batool, Muhammad Shafqat Nawaz","doi":"10.52700/ijlc.v1i2.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conjunctive cohesion is an indispensable linguistic signpost that writers use to create a logical relationship between the parts of the text (Halliday and Hasan, 1976). In the present study, the conjunctive analysis of Pakistani Social Science Articles (PSSA) has been carried out. This study is corpus-based, and the corpus comprised 250 articles that were taken from five Social science disciplines: Applied Linguistics (AL), English Literature (EL), Business Administration (BA), Sociology (SL), and Psychology (PL). The distribution of 50 articles from each discipline had been retrieved from online sources. The frequencies of conjunctive features (CFs) were counted and compared, and conjunctive features (CFs) were studied functionally. A comprehensive model on conjunctive cohesion (CC) has been proposed for the classification of cohesive devices. The results revealed that all the writers used extension conjunction more frequently than other conjunctions. Additive cohesion, a sub-category of extension conjunction, was used more frequently across the academic writings of all disciplines in general and discipline of EL in particular. The sub-categories of elaboration and enhancement conjunction, exemplification and causative, were also found to be used more frequently in addition to the additive cohesion. Consequently, it was concluded that the academic writings of EL had high frequencies of conjunctive cohesion, and various categories of conjunctive cohesion were used to serve certain purposes. This study has practical implications for social science teachers and scholars in addition to EFL/ESL students.","PeriodicalId":161767,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Linguistics and Culture","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Linguistics and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52700/ijlc.v1i2.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Conjunctive cohesion is an indispensable linguistic signpost that writers use to create a logical relationship between the parts of the text (Halliday and Hasan, 1976). In the present study, the conjunctive analysis of Pakistani Social Science Articles (PSSA) has been carried out. This study is corpus-based, and the corpus comprised 250 articles that were taken from five Social science disciplines: Applied Linguistics (AL), English Literature (EL), Business Administration (BA), Sociology (SL), and Psychology (PL). The distribution of 50 articles from each discipline had been retrieved from online sources. The frequencies of conjunctive features (CFs) were counted and compared, and conjunctive features (CFs) were studied functionally. A comprehensive model on conjunctive cohesion (CC) has been proposed for the classification of cohesive devices. The results revealed that all the writers used extension conjunction more frequently than other conjunctions. Additive cohesion, a sub-category of extension conjunction, was used more frequently across the academic writings of all disciplines in general and discipline of EL in particular. The sub-categories of elaboration and enhancement conjunction, exemplification and causative, were also found to be used more frequently in addition to the additive cohesion. Consequently, it was concluded that the academic writings of EL had high frequencies of conjunctive cohesion, and various categories of conjunctive cohesion were used to serve certain purposes. This study has practical implications for social science teachers and scholars in addition to EFL/ESL students.
连词衔接是作家在篇章各部分之间建立逻辑关系所不可或缺的语言标志(Halliday and Hasan, 1976)。本研究对巴基斯坦社会科学论文(PSSA)进行了关联分析。本研究以语料库为基础,语料库包括来自五个社会科学学科的250篇文章:应用语言学(AL)、英国文学(EL)、工商管理(BA)、社会学(SL)和心理学(PL)。每个学科50篇文章的分布已从网上资源中检索。对连接特征的频率进行了统计和比较,并对连接特征进行了功能研究。本文提出了一个综合的连接衔接模型,用于衔接手段的分类。结果表明,所有作者使用扩展连词的频率都高于其他连词。加性衔接是引申衔接的一个子类别,在所有学科的学术著作中使用得更为频繁,尤其是英语语言学科。除了加性衔接外,细化和强化连接、例证和使役的子类别也被发现使用得更频繁。结果表明,英语学术文章中连接衔接的使用频率较高,并且使用了各种类型的连接衔接来达到一定的目的。本研究对社会科学教师和学者以及EFL/ESL学生具有实际意义。