Abolitionism and the Back-to-Africa Movement in Britain: The Sierra Leone Experiment

Pavlin Atanasov
{"title":"Abolitionism and the Back-to-Africa Movement in Britain: The Sierra Leone Experiment","authors":"Pavlin Atanasov","doi":"10.54664/dbvw7029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the settlement of freed black slaves from England and Nova Scotia in Sierra Leone. As the eighteenth century drew to a close, plans were made for the “repatriation” of impoverished migrants of African descent to their “ancestral” land. Such plans were contextually defined by the abolitionist movement in Britain. Abolitionism gained exceptional momentum in the country that played a leading part in the transatlantic slave trade at that time. The movement aimed to end both the slave trade and slavery. The article investigates the activities of the Committee for the Relief of the Black Poor and especially the role of the prominent British philanthropist and abolitionist Granville Sharp (1735–1813), who made significant efforts to bring the “repatriation” plans to fruition. I argue that the Sierra Leone project was an ambivalent experiment, which should be interpreted in the light of both humanitarian compassion and imperial interests: if, at first, it was premised upon idealism and religious fervour, the desire to set foot in west Africa and to set up a colony there subsequently prevailed. For some Britons, sending impoverished free blacks to distant shores was also an opportunity to expel them from their own “white” society. In this sense, the “repatriation” of Africans was most likely to occur in the form of deportation, a form that suggests the restrictive regime of penal colonies, such as Australia.","PeriodicalId":124585,"journal":{"name":"VTU Review: Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VTU Review: Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54664/dbvw7029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article focuses on the settlement of freed black slaves from England and Nova Scotia in Sierra Leone. As the eighteenth century drew to a close, plans were made for the “repatriation” of impoverished migrants of African descent to their “ancestral” land. Such plans were contextually defined by the abolitionist movement in Britain. Abolitionism gained exceptional momentum in the country that played a leading part in the transatlantic slave trade at that time. The movement aimed to end both the slave trade and slavery. The article investigates the activities of the Committee for the Relief of the Black Poor and especially the role of the prominent British philanthropist and abolitionist Granville Sharp (1735–1813), who made significant efforts to bring the “repatriation” plans to fruition. I argue that the Sierra Leone project was an ambivalent experiment, which should be interpreted in the light of both humanitarian compassion and imperial interests: if, at first, it was premised upon idealism and religious fervour, the desire to set foot in west Africa and to set up a colony there subsequently prevailed. For some Britons, sending impoverished free blacks to distant shores was also an opportunity to expel them from their own “white” society. In this sense, the “repatriation” of Africans was most likely to occur in the form of deportation, a form that suggests the restrictive regime of penal colonies, such as Australia.
英国的废奴主义和回归非洲运动:塞拉利昂实验
这篇文章的重点是安置从英国和新斯科舍解放的黑人奴隶在塞拉利昂。随着18世纪接近尾声,人们制定了将贫困的非洲裔移民“遣返”回其“祖先”土地的计划。这些计划是由英国的废奴主义运动所决定的。废奴主义在这个当时在跨大西洋奴隶贸易中起主导作用的国家获得了异乎寻常的势头。这场运动旨在结束奴隶贸易和奴隶制。本文考察了救济黑人穷人委员会的活动,特别是英国著名慈善家和废奴主义者格兰维尔·夏普(Granville Sharp, 1735-1813)的作用,他为“遣返”计划的实现做出了重大努力。我认为,塞拉利昂项目是一个矛盾的实验,应该从人道主义同情和帝国利益的角度来解释:如果一开始,它是以理想主义和宗教热情为前提的,那么后来,涉足西非并在那里建立殖民地的愿望占了上风。对一些英国人来说,将贫困的自由黑人送到遥远的海岸也是将他们驱逐出自己的“白人”社会的机会。从这个意义上说,非洲人的“遣返”最有可能以驱逐出境的形式发生,这种形式使人联想到澳大利亚等流放地的限制性制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信