Developing Interventions

L. Thomas, Beverley French, C. Sutton, Denise Forshaw, M. Leathley, C. Burton, B. Roe, F. Cheater, J. Booth, E. McColl, B. Carter, Andrew Walker, K. Brittain, G. Whiteley, H. Rodgers, James Barrett, C. Watkins, carer involvement groups
{"title":"Developing Interventions","authors":"L. Thomas, Beverley French, C. Sutton, Denise Forshaw, M. Leathley, C. Burton, B. Roe, F. Cheater, J. Booth, E. McColl, B. Carter, Andrew Walker, K. Brittain, G. Whiteley, H. Rodgers, James Barrett, C. Watkins, carer involvement groups","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190933692.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Interventions are control and prevention measures that public health officials select and implement at one or more points in time after initiating a field investigation in response to an acute public health problem. Regardless of the nature of the problem, an immediate need exists to understand what is happening and to recommend and implement control and prevention measures that are scientifically justified and acceptable to the community. Public health officials must recommend these actions often without incontrovertible epidemiologic proof of a causal association between the putative source or cause of the problem and occurrence of exposure and disease or injury. Under such circumstances, the key question for the field epidemiologist and decision-makers is: “How much epidemiologic certainty is required before initiating action?” This chapter discusses the decision-making process regarding interventions during the course of epidemiologic field investigations and concludes with a summary of actions relating to interventions that should be considered at each progressive stage of the field investigation.","PeriodicalId":371391,"journal":{"name":"The CDC Field Epidemiology Manual","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CDC Field Epidemiology Manual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190933692.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Interventions are control and prevention measures that public health officials select and implement at one or more points in time after initiating a field investigation in response to an acute public health problem. Regardless of the nature of the problem, an immediate need exists to understand what is happening and to recommend and implement control and prevention measures that are scientifically justified and acceptable to the community. Public health officials must recommend these actions often without incontrovertible epidemiologic proof of a causal association between the putative source or cause of the problem and occurrence of exposure and disease or injury. Under such circumstances, the key question for the field epidemiologist and decision-makers is: “How much epidemiologic certainty is required before initiating action?” This chapter discusses the decision-making process regarding interventions during the course of epidemiologic field investigations and concludes with a summary of actions relating to interventions that should be considered at each progressive stage of the field investigation.
发展干预措施
干预措施是公共卫生官员在针对严重公共卫生问题开展实地调查后,在一个或多个时间点选择和实施的控制和预防措施。无论问题的性质如何,都迫切需要了解正在发生的情况,并建议和实施科学合理且为社会所接受的控制和预防措施。公共卫生官员必须经常在没有无可争议的流行病学证据证明问题的假定来源或原因与接触和疾病或伤害的发生之间存在因果关系的情况下建议这些行动。在这种情况下,现场流行病学家和决策者面临的关键问题是:“在采取行动之前,需要多少流行病学确定性?”本章讨论了流行病学现场调查过程中有关干预措施的决策过程,并总结了在现场调查的每个渐进阶段应考虑的与干预措施有关的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信