Comparison of Whole and Section Otolith Methods for Age Determination of Carp (Cyprinus carpio)

Aykut Aydın, N. Polat, S. Saygın, M. Özpiçak, S. Yılmaz
{"title":"Comparison of Whole and Section Otolith Methods for Age Determination of Carp (Cyprinus carpio)","authors":"Aykut Aydın, N. Polat, S. Saygın, M. Özpiçak, S. Yılmaz","doi":"10.53433/yyufbed.1129009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the reliability of age determination by comparing whole and section otoliths of Cyprinus carpio species living in Altınkaya Dam Lake (ADL) and Bafra Fish Lakes (BFL). Fish samples (117 individuals) were obtained between 2017-2018, and the total lengths of each fish were measured (±0.1 cm) and their weights (±0.01 g) were weighed. Ages were determined from the distal surfaces of all otoliths (asteriscus) and transversal sections were taken. Percent agreement, average percent error and coefficient of variation were calculated. In the population, total lengths ranged between 17.8-69.3 cm and weights ranged between 67.57-5 412 g. The ages read in whole and section otoliths were determined as 2-6, 2-7 in ADL and 1-8,0-7 in BFL, respectively. It is the section otolith method with the highest percent agreement (75.43% and 71.67%, respectively), the lowest mean percent error (3.89; 3.98) and coefficient of variation (5.11; 5.29) for ADL and BFL. For age determination of C.carpio species in both localities, it has been determined that the age readings obtained by the section otolith method provide more reliable results than the whole otolith method.","PeriodicalId":386555,"journal":{"name":"Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53433/yyufbed.1129009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the reliability of age determination by comparing whole and section otoliths of Cyprinus carpio species living in Altınkaya Dam Lake (ADL) and Bafra Fish Lakes (BFL). Fish samples (117 individuals) were obtained between 2017-2018, and the total lengths of each fish were measured (±0.1 cm) and their weights (±0.01 g) were weighed. Ages were determined from the distal surfaces of all otoliths (asteriscus) and transversal sections were taken. Percent agreement, average percent error and coefficient of variation were calculated. In the population, total lengths ranged between 17.8-69.3 cm and weights ranged between 67.57-5 412 g. The ages read in whole and section otoliths were determined as 2-6, 2-7 in ADL and 1-8,0-7 in BFL, respectively. It is the section otolith method with the highest percent agreement (75.43% and 71.67%, respectively), the lowest mean percent error (3.89; 3.98) and coefficient of variation (5.11; 5.29) for ADL and BFL. For age determination of C.carpio species in both localities, it has been determined that the age readings obtained by the section otolith method provide more reliable results than the whole otolith method.
鲤鱼全耳石法与切片耳石法测定年龄的比较
本研究旨在通过比较Altınkaya坝湖(ADL)和Bafra鱼湖(BFL)鲤科鲤(Cyprinus carpio)的整体和剖面耳石,确定年龄测定的可靠性。在2017-2018年间获得了117条鱼的样本,并测量了每条鱼的总长度(±0.1 cm)和重量(±0.01 g)。从所有耳石(星形)远端表面测定年龄,并取横切面。计算一致性百分比、平均误差百分比和变异系数。总体长在17.8 ~ 69.3 cm之间,体重在67.57 ~ 5 412 g之间。整体和剖面耳石年龄分别为ADL的2-6、2-7岁和BFL的1-8、0-7岁。剖面耳石法的一致性最高(分别为75.43%和71.67%),平均误差率最低(3.89;3.98)和变异系数(5.11;ADL和BFL为5.29)。对于这两个地点的卡皮蛇种的年龄测定,已经确定用剖面耳石法获得的年龄读数比用整体耳石法获得的结果更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信