Patterns of Alcohol Policy Enforcement Activities among Local Law Enforcement Agencies: A Latent Class Analysis.

D. Erickson, P. Rutledge, Kathleen M. Lenk, T. Nelson, R. Jones-Webb, T. Toomey
{"title":"Patterns of Alcohol Policy Enforcement Activities among Local Law Enforcement Agencies: A Latent Class Analysis.","authors":"D. Erickson, P. Rutledge, Kathleen M. Lenk, T. Nelson, R. Jones-Webb, T. Toomey","doi":"10.7895/IJADR.V4I2.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\nWe assessed levels and patterns of alcohol policy enforcement activities among U.S. local law enforcement agencies.\n\n\nDESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS\nWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of 1,631 local law enforcement agencies across the 50 states.\n\n\nMEASURES/METHODS\nWe assessed 29 alcohol policy enforcement activities within each of five enforcement domains-underage alcohol possession/consumption, underage alcohol provision, underage alcohol sales, impaired driving, and overservice of alcohol-and conducted a series of latent class analyses to identify unique classes or patterns of enforcement activity for each domain.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nWe identified three to four unique enforcement activity classes for each of the enforcement domains. In four of the domains, we identified a Uniformly Low class (i.e., little or no enforcement) and a Uniformly High enforcement activity class (i.e., relatively high levels of enforcement), with one or two middle classes where some but not all activities were conducted. The underage provision domain had a Uniformly Low class but not a Uniformly High class. The Uniformly Low class was the most prevalent class in three domains: underage provision (58%), underage sales (61%), and overservice (79%). In contrast, less than a quarter of agencies were in Uniformly High classes.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWe identified qualitatively distinct patterns of enforcement activity, with a large proportion of agencies in classes characterized by little or no enforcement and fewer agencies in high enforcement classes. An important next step is to determine if these patterns are associated with rates of alcohol use and alcohol-related injury and mortality.","PeriodicalId":162336,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7895/IJADR.V4I2.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

AIMS We assessed levels and patterns of alcohol policy enforcement activities among U.S. local law enforcement agencies. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of 1,631 local law enforcement agencies across the 50 states. MEASURES/METHODS We assessed 29 alcohol policy enforcement activities within each of five enforcement domains-underage alcohol possession/consumption, underage alcohol provision, underage alcohol sales, impaired driving, and overservice of alcohol-and conducted a series of latent class analyses to identify unique classes or patterns of enforcement activity for each domain. FINDINGS We identified three to four unique enforcement activity classes for each of the enforcement domains. In four of the domains, we identified a Uniformly Low class (i.e., little or no enforcement) and a Uniformly High enforcement activity class (i.e., relatively high levels of enforcement), with one or two middle classes where some but not all activities were conducted. The underage provision domain had a Uniformly Low class but not a Uniformly High class. The Uniformly Low class was the most prevalent class in three domains: underage provision (58%), underage sales (61%), and overservice (79%). In contrast, less than a quarter of agencies were in Uniformly High classes. CONCLUSIONS We identified qualitatively distinct patterns of enforcement activity, with a large proportion of agencies in classes characterized by little or no enforcement and fewer agencies in high enforcement classes. An important next step is to determine if these patterns are associated with rates of alcohol use and alcohol-related injury and mortality.
地方执法机构酒精政策执法活动模式:潜在阶级分析。
目的:我们评估了美国地方执法机构酒精政策执法活动的水平和模式。设计/设置/参与者我们对50个州1,631个地方执法机构的代表性样本进行了横断面调查。措施/方法我们评估了5个执法领域(未成年人持有/消费酒精、未成年人提供酒精、未成年人销售酒精、不良驾驶和酒精过度服务)内的29项酒精政策执法活动,并进行了一系列潜在类别分析,以确定每个领域执法活动的独特类别或模式。我们为每个执法领域确定了三到四个独特的执法活动类别。在其中的四个领域中,我们确定了一个统一的低级别(即,很少或没有执行)和一个统一的高级别执行活动类别(即,相对较高的执行水平),以及一个或两个中产阶级,其中进行了一些但不是全部的活动。未成年人供养领域有统一的低等级,但没有统一的高等级。在以下三个领域中,“统一低”类别最为普遍:未成年人提供服务(58%)、未成年人销售(61%)和过度服务(79%)。相比之下,只有不到四分之一的机构属于统一高中。结论:我们确定了执法活动在质量上的不同模式,其中大部分机构属于执法很少或没有执法的类别,而执法程度高的类别的机构较少。重要的下一步是确定这些模式是否与酒精使用率和酒精相关伤害和死亡率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信