16 Un-American Geographies: Transpacific Thinking and Asian American Studies

L. Yoneyama
{"title":"16 Un-American Geographies: Transpacific Thinking and Asian American Studies","authors":"L. Yoneyama","doi":"10.1353/jaas.2022.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Attending to the relationship between geography and knowledge, this essay considers Asian American studies in relationship to Native Pacific Islander studies, Southeast Asian American studies, and transpacific inquiries. The deepening exchanges across these fields show us that transpacific thinking has re-radicalized the past and present Asian American studies agenda by eliciting the longue durée of US imperialist entrenchment. As critical transpacific perspectives continue to re-politicize Asian American affiliations as undisciplined and un-American, Asian American studies as an unruly \"activist interdiscipline\" promises to offer alternative geographies that refuse the reiteration of US geopolitics or any other form of state-governed interpellations.","PeriodicalId":125906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian American Studies","volume":"8 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.2022.0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Attending to the relationship between geography and knowledge, this essay considers Asian American studies in relationship to Native Pacific Islander studies, Southeast Asian American studies, and transpacific inquiries. The deepening exchanges across these fields show us that transpacific thinking has re-radicalized the past and present Asian American studies agenda by eliciting the longue durée of US imperialist entrenchment. As critical transpacific perspectives continue to re-politicize Asian American affiliations as undisciplined and un-American, Asian American studies as an unruly "activist interdiscipline" promises to offer alternative geographies that refuse the reiteration of US geopolitics or any other form of state-governed interpellations.
非美国地理学:跨太平洋思维与亚裔美国人研究
摘要:本文从地理与知识的关系出发,考察了亚裔美国人研究与太平洋土著岛民研究、东南亚亚裔美国人研究和跨太平洋研究的关系。跨这些领域的深入交流向我们表明,跨太平洋思维通过引发美帝国主义堑壕的长期斗争,重新激进了过去和现在的亚裔美国人研究议程。随着批判性的跨太平洋观点继续将亚裔美国人的关系重新政治化,认为这是无纪律的、非美国的,亚裔美国人研究作为一种不守规矩的“激进的跨学科”,有望提供另一种地理学,拒绝重申美国地缘政治或任何其他形式的国家治理的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信