The Logic of the Symbol

A. Losev
{"title":"The Logic of the Symbol","authors":"A. Losev","doi":"10.2753/RSL1061-1975200203108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. Formulation of the problem. Anyone who has studied the history of philosophy or aesthetics with any attention must recognize that in the course of his research, he often encounters certain terms which are usually considered to be generally understood and which can be translated into any other language without much difficulty through the use of the same word in every case. For the most part we use these terms without any analysis; and if we encounter them in classical philosophy, we often continue to use them for a long time in modern languages in their Greek or Latin form. Some examples of such terms are the words \"structure,\" \"element,\" \"idea,\" \"form,\" \"text,\" and \"context.\" However, the illusion that they are generally understood begins to break down gradually when we study texts of classical literature, and the scholar is often obliged to abandon this illusion and subject many terms or concepts to special historical investigation. Among such terms is \"symbol.\" What could be apparently simpler than t...","PeriodicalId":173745,"journal":{"name":"Soviet Studies in Literature","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet Studies in Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSL1061-1975200203108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

1. Formulation of the problem. Anyone who has studied the history of philosophy or aesthetics with any attention must recognize that in the course of his research, he often encounters certain terms which are usually considered to be generally understood and which can be translated into any other language without much difficulty through the use of the same word in every case. For the most part we use these terms without any analysis; and if we encounter them in classical philosophy, we often continue to use them for a long time in modern languages in their Greek or Latin form. Some examples of such terms are the words "structure," "element," "idea," "form," "text," and "context." However, the illusion that they are generally understood begins to break down gradually when we study texts of classical literature, and the scholar is often obliged to abandon this illusion and subject many terms or concepts to special historical investigation. Among such terms is "symbol." What could be apparently simpler than t...
符号的逻辑
1. 问题的表述。任何一个认真研究过哲学史或美学史的人都必须认识到,在他的研究过程中,他经常遇到一些术语,这些术语通常被认为是普遍理解的,并且可以通过在任何情况下使用同一个词而毫无困难地翻译成任何其他语言。在大多数情况下,我们使用这些术语时没有进行任何分析;如果我们在古典哲学中遇到它们,我们通常会在很长一段时间内以希腊语或拉丁语的形式在现代语言中继续使用它们。这些术语的一些例子是“结构”、“元素”、“想法”、“形式”、“文本”和“上下文”。然而,当我们研究古典文学文本时,这种普遍理解的错觉开始逐渐破裂,学者往往不得不放弃这种错觉,对许多术语或概念进行专门的历史研究。“符号”就是其中之一。还有什么比这更简单呢?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信