Mimicry Attacks Demystified: What Can Attackers Do to Evade Detection?

H. G. Kayacik, A. N. Zincir-Heywood
{"title":"Mimicry Attacks Demystified: What Can Attackers Do to Evade Detection?","authors":"H. G. Kayacik, A. N. Zincir-Heywood","doi":"10.1109/PST.2008.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mimicry attacks have been the focus of detector research where the objective of the attacker is to generate an attack that evades detection while achieving the attackerpsilas goals. If such an attack can be found, it implies that the target detector is vulnerable against mimicry attacks. In this work, we emphasize that there are two components of a buffer overflow attack: the preamble and the exploit. Although the attacker can modify the exploit component easily, the attacker may not be able to prevent preamble from generating anomalous behavior since during preamble stage, the attacker does not have full control. Previous work on mimicry attacks considered an attack to completely evade detection, if the exploit raises no alarms. On the other hand, in this work, we investigate the source of anomalies in both the preamble and the exploit components against two anomaly detectors that monitor four vulnerable UNIX applications. Our experiment results show that preamble can be a source of anomalies, particularly if it is lengthy and anomalous.","PeriodicalId":422934,"journal":{"name":"2008 Sixth Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Sixth Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2008.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Mimicry attacks have been the focus of detector research where the objective of the attacker is to generate an attack that evades detection while achieving the attackerpsilas goals. If such an attack can be found, it implies that the target detector is vulnerable against mimicry attacks. In this work, we emphasize that there are two components of a buffer overflow attack: the preamble and the exploit. Although the attacker can modify the exploit component easily, the attacker may not be able to prevent preamble from generating anomalous behavior since during preamble stage, the attacker does not have full control. Previous work on mimicry attacks considered an attack to completely evade detection, if the exploit raises no alarms. On the other hand, in this work, we investigate the source of anomalies in both the preamble and the exploit components against two anomaly detectors that monitor four vulnerable UNIX applications. Our experiment results show that preamble can be a source of anomalies, particularly if it is lengthy and anomalous.
模拟攻击揭秘:攻击者可以做些什么来逃避检测?
模仿攻击一直是检测器研究的焦点,攻击者的目标是在实现攻击者的目标的同时产生逃避检测的攻击。如果这样的攻击可以被发现,这意味着目标检测器容易受到模仿攻击。在这项工作中,我们强调缓冲区溢出攻击有两个组成部分:序言和漏洞利用。虽然攻击者可以很容易地修改漏洞利用组件,但攻击者可能无法阻止preamble生成异常行为,因为在preamble阶段,攻击者没有完全的控制权。以前对模仿攻击的研究认为,如果攻击没有引起警报,则攻击可以完全逃避检测。另一方面,在这项工作中,我们针对监视四个易受攻击的UNIX应用程序的两个异常检测器调查了序言和利用组件中的异常来源。我们的实验结果表明,序言可能是异常的来源,特别是如果它是冗长和异常的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信