It's always April fools' day!: On the difficulty of social network misinformation classification via propagation features

M. Conti, Daniele Lain, R. Lazzeretti, Giulio Lovisotto, Walter Quattrociocchi
{"title":"It's always April fools' day!: On the difficulty of social network misinformation classification via propagation features","authors":"M. Conti, Daniele Lain, R. Lazzeretti, Giulio Lovisotto, Walter Quattrociocchi","doi":"10.1109/WIFS.2017.8267653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the huge impact that Online Social Networks (OSN) had in the way people get informed and form their opinion, they became an attractive playground for malicious entities that want to spread misinformation, and leverage their effect. In fact, misinformation easily spreads on OSN, and this is a huge threat for modern society, possibly influencing also the outcome of elections, or even putting people's life at risk (e.g., spreading \"anti-vaccines\" misinformation). Therefore, it is of paramount importance for our society to have some sort of \"validation\" on information spreading through OSN. The need for a wide-scale validation would greatly benefit from automatic tools. In this paper, we show that it is difficult to carry out an automatic classification of misinformation considering only structural properties of content propagation cascades. We focus on structural properties, because they would be inherently difficult to be manipulated, with the the aim of circumventing classification systems. To support our claim, we carry out an extensive evaluation on Facebook posts belonging to conspiracy theories (representative of misinformation), and scientific news (representative of fact-checked content). Our findings show that conspiracy content reverberates in a way which is hard to distinguish from scientific content: for the classification mechanism we investigated, classification F-score never exceeds 0.7.","PeriodicalId":305837,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WIFS.2017.8267653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Given the huge impact that Online Social Networks (OSN) had in the way people get informed and form their opinion, they became an attractive playground for malicious entities that want to spread misinformation, and leverage their effect. In fact, misinformation easily spreads on OSN, and this is a huge threat for modern society, possibly influencing also the outcome of elections, or even putting people's life at risk (e.g., spreading "anti-vaccines" misinformation). Therefore, it is of paramount importance for our society to have some sort of "validation" on information spreading through OSN. The need for a wide-scale validation would greatly benefit from automatic tools. In this paper, we show that it is difficult to carry out an automatic classification of misinformation considering only structural properties of content propagation cascades. We focus on structural properties, because they would be inherently difficult to be manipulated, with the the aim of circumventing classification systems. To support our claim, we carry out an extensive evaluation on Facebook posts belonging to conspiracy theories (representative of misinformation), and scientific news (representative of fact-checked content). Our findings show that conspiracy content reverberates in a way which is hard to distinguish from scientific content: for the classification mechanism we investigated, classification F-score never exceeds 0.7.
永远是愚人节!:基于传播特征的社交网络错误信息分类难度研究
鉴于在线社交网络(OSN)对人们获取信息和形成观点的方式产生的巨大影响,它们成为恶意实体传播错误信息并利用其影响的诱人游乐场。事实上,错误信息很容易在OSN上传播,这对现代社会构成巨大威胁,还可能影响选举结果,甚至危及人们的生命(例如,传播"反疫苗"的错误信息)。因此,对通过OSN传播的信息进行某种“验证”,对我们的社会至关重要。对大规模验证的需求将极大地受益于自动化工具。在本文中,我们证明了仅考虑内容传播级联的结构属性很难对错误信息进行自动分类。我们关注结构属性,因为它们本来就很难被操纵,目的是绕过分类系统。为了支持我们的说法,我们对Facebook上属于阴谋论(错误信息的代表)和科学新闻(事实核查内容的代表)的帖子进行了广泛的评估。我们的研究结果表明,阴谋内容以一种难以与科学内容区分的方式回响:对于我们调查的分类机制,分类f得分从未超过0.7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信