Online Finance and Economics Courses: A Comparative Study of Course Satisfaction and Outcomes across Learning Models.

L. S. Wiechowski, Terri L. Washburn
{"title":"Online Finance and Economics Courses: A Comparative Study of Course Satisfaction and Outcomes across Learning Models.","authors":"L. S. Wiechowski, Terri L. Washburn","doi":"10.19030/AJBE.V7I1.8318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Student learning outcomes and course satisfaction scores are two key considerations when assessing the success of any degree program. This empirical study was based upon more than 3,000 end-of-semester course evaluations collected from 171 courses in the 2010-2011 academic year. The study, conducted at a Midwestern business college, considered the model of learning when examining course satisfaction scores of finance and economics courses. The finance and economics courses at the college all use active learning constructs, even in the online and blended course models. Online, blended and face-to-face courses were studied to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference between course satisfaction and any of the models of learning. Surprisingly, online and blended courses had a stronger relationship with high course satisfaction than did face-to-face courses. The average grade point average of each course was also correlated with the three learning models, seeking a relationship between learning outcomes and online, blended and face-to-face courses. There was no significant relationship found among student learning outcomes, as demonstrated by grade point average, and model of learning, indicating that students were able to achieve the same outcomes despite model of learning chosen.","PeriodicalId":356538,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Business Education","volume":"22 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Business Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/AJBE.V7I1.8318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Student learning outcomes and course satisfaction scores are two key considerations when assessing the success of any degree program. This empirical study was based upon more than 3,000 end-of-semester course evaluations collected from 171 courses in the 2010-2011 academic year. The study, conducted at a Midwestern business college, considered the model of learning when examining course satisfaction scores of finance and economics courses. The finance and economics courses at the college all use active learning constructs, even in the online and blended course models. Online, blended and face-to-face courses were studied to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference between course satisfaction and any of the models of learning. Surprisingly, online and blended courses had a stronger relationship with high course satisfaction than did face-to-face courses. The average grade point average of each course was also correlated with the three learning models, seeking a relationship between learning outcomes and online, blended and face-to-face courses. There was no significant relationship found among student learning outcomes, as demonstrated by grade point average, and model of learning, indicating that students were able to achieve the same outcomes despite model of learning chosen.
网络财经课程:不同学习模式下课程满意度与效果的比较研究
学生的学习成果和课程满意度分数是评估任何学位课程成功与否的两个关键考虑因素。本实证研究基于2010-2011学年171门课程的3000多份学期末课程评估。这项研究是在美国中西部的一所商学院进行的,在考察金融和经济课程的课程满意度分数时考虑了学习模式。学院的金融和经济课程都采用主动学习结构,即使是在线和混合课程模式。我们研究了在线课程、混合课程和面对面课程,以确定课程满意度和任何一种学习模式之间是否存在统计学上的显著差异。令人惊讶的是,与面对面课程相比,在线课程和混合课程与课程满意度的关系更强。每门课程的平均绩点也与三种学习模式相关,寻求学习成果与在线、混合和面对面课程之间的关系。学生的学习成果(如平均成绩)与学习模式之间没有显著的关系,这表明学生无论选择哪种学习模式都能达到相同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信