The Rise-and-Fall of Leading International Financial Centers: Factors and Application

Adam L Church
{"title":"The Rise-and-Fall of Leading International Financial Centers: Factors and Application","authors":"Adam L Church","doi":"10.36639/mbelr.7.2.rise","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Note will look at the role of four broad factors that correspond with the rise-and-fall cycles among leading international financial centers. The four factors are: trust in a financial center’s abilities; the central banking and monetary policy systems of the center’s home nation; the home nation’s landscape of financial policy and regulation; and the overall stability of the financial center itself. First, this Note will undertake a broad historical survey of the shifts in prominence from Amsterdam to London, from London to New York, and from New York back to London to define the scope of these factors through analyzing how they have manifested and evolved over time. In order to further understand the limits of these factors, this Note will also analyze two historical instances where two cities vied for the position of the leading international financial center, Paris versus London and Tokyo versus New York, and no corresponding shift occurred, despite the manifestation of some of the factors. In addition, to understand the role of politics in influencing these factors, this Note will also consider the shift between the financial centers of Frankfurt and Berlin during the nineteenth century. After defining the scope of the factors through this broad historical survey, this Note will analyze the presence of these factors in the modern international financial system in light of Brexit in order to assess their predictive capabilities. Lastly, this Note will consider the future relevance of international financial centers as a critical structure within the international financial system, and whether the factors might shed any light on the likelihood that emerging disruptive technologies might render international financial centers obsolete.","PeriodicalId":177599,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36639/mbelr.7.2.rise","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This Note will look at the role of four broad factors that correspond with the rise-and-fall cycles among leading international financial centers. The four factors are: trust in a financial center’s abilities; the central banking and monetary policy systems of the center’s home nation; the home nation’s landscape of financial policy and regulation; and the overall stability of the financial center itself. First, this Note will undertake a broad historical survey of the shifts in prominence from Amsterdam to London, from London to New York, and from New York back to London to define the scope of these factors through analyzing how they have manifested and evolved over time. In order to further understand the limits of these factors, this Note will also analyze two historical instances where two cities vied for the position of the leading international financial center, Paris versus London and Tokyo versus New York, and no corresponding shift occurred, despite the manifestation of some of the factors. In addition, to understand the role of politics in influencing these factors, this Note will also consider the shift between the financial centers of Frankfurt and Berlin during the nineteenth century. After defining the scope of the factors through this broad historical survey, this Note will analyze the presence of these factors in the modern international financial system in light of Brexit in order to assess their predictive capabilities. Lastly, this Note will consider the future relevance of international financial centers as a critical structure within the international financial system, and whether the factors might shed any light on the likelihood that emerging disruptive technologies might render international financial centers obsolete.
国际主要金融中心的兴衰:影响因素及应用
本说明将探讨与主要国际金融中心的兴衰周期相对应的四个主要因素的作用。这四个因素是:对金融中心能力的信任;该中心所在国的中央银行和货币政策体系;本国的金融政策和监管格局;以及金融中心自身的整体稳定。首先,本文将对从阿姆斯特丹到伦敦、从伦敦到纽约、从纽约回到伦敦的重要变化进行广泛的历史调查,通过分析这些因素如何随着时间的推移而表现和演变,来界定这些因素的范围。为了进一步了解这些因素的局限性,本说明还将分析两个历史实例,两个城市争夺领先的国际金融中心的地位,巴黎与伦敦和东京与纽约,并没有发生相应的转移,尽管一些因素的表现。此外,为了理解政治在影响这些因素中的作用,本说明还将考虑19世纪法兰克福和柏林金融中心之间的转移。在通过这一广泛的历史调查定义了这些因素的范围之后,本说明将根据英国脱欧分析这些因素在现代国际金融体系中的存在,以评估其预测能力。最后,本说明将考虑国际金融中心作为国际金融体系中一个关键结构的未来相关性,以及这些因素是否可能揭示新兴颠覆性技术可能使国际金融中心过时的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信