ENERGY BALANCE UNDER RESTRICTED FEEDING IN RUMINANTS

K. Abdel-Rahman, H. Taie, A. Askar
{"title":"ENERGY BALANCE UNDER RESTRICTED FEEDING IN RUMINANTS","authors":"K. Abdel-Rahman, H. Taie, A. Askar","doi":"10.21608/mjapfp.2020.122561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forty-eight adult local desert non-pregnant and non-lactating females, age 4-5 yrs.; Barki sheep (n= 16 and average body weight 34.53 ±1.56 kg), Balady goats (n= 16 and average body weight 31.11 ± 1.63 kg), and Shami goats (n=16 and average body weight 28.08±0.92 kg) were used to study effects of long-term restricted feeding regime on body weight changes and balance of energy and protein. Animals of each species were allocated to two levels of feed intake; control feeding treatment (CON) where animals fed a diet at a level of feeding to meet approximately the metabolizable energy for maintenance requirement (MEm), while those on the other dietary treatment was fed almost 50% of these quantities on a BW basis, termed as the restricted treatment (restricted; RES). Alfalfa hay and concentrate feed mixture (50:50% as DM basis) were given based on requirement recommendations. The results could be summarized as follows: \n \n1-Comparison between Balady goats (BG) and Sheep (SH): \nThe ADG was not affected (P<0.05) by animal species (BG vs. SH), however, it was affected (P<0.01) by feed intake level where the RES animal group showed a negative ADG (-65.6 g/d) compared with the CON group that achieved positive ADG (36.4 g/d). Both of SH and BG had similar negative energy balance (EB) values (67.0 vs. 61.4 KJ/ kg0.75/d, for BG and SH respectively). Nitrogen balance (NB) was greater (P<0.01) for SH (107.64 mg/kg0.75/d ) vs. BG (89.47 mg/kg0.75/d) and was greater (P<0.01) for animals fed on CON intake (251.47 vs. 208.55 mg/kg0.75/d, respectively) than those fed on RES intake (-36.18 vs. -29.62 mg/kg0.75/d, respectively), which gave a negative NB. \n2.Comparison between Balady goats (BG)and Shami goats (SG): \nThe ADG was not affected (P< 0.05) by animal species (BG vs. SG) being corresponding values 45.1 and 40.6 g/d respectively. However, ADG was affected (P< 0.001) by feed intake level where the RES animal group showed a negative ADG (-55.6 g/d) compared with the CON group that achieved positive ADG (30.1 g/d). Under CON intake, EB was an insignificant decrease in SG compared to BG. However, under RES intake both BG and SG had a negative energy balance (kJ/kg0.75/day) and it was lower (P<0.01) in SG than that in BG. Animals fed on the CON intake level had a greater (P<0.01) value for EB compared to those fed on RES intake and the latter gave a negative balance. Nitrogen balance (NB, mg/kg0.75/day) was a trend to be greater (P<0.10) for SG vs. BG. Also, animals under the CON intake level captured more nitrogen than their counterparts, which lost a large amount of nitrogen. Also, the retention N was increased (P<0.01) in SG than BG under the CON intake level, however, all breeds were lost N under the RES intake level especially in SG (-76.37) followed by BG (-29.62). \nIt could be concluded that with hot conditions, sheep may have an advantage in a decreased Metabolizable energy for maintenance (MEm) requirement and reduction in heat production of a magnitude adequate to maintain body weight. There is a similar rate of using the energy between sheep and goats with moderate or limited nutrition planes. It is clear that Balady goats are better than Shami goats in their ability to reduce the energy expenditure via reducing the rate of metabolism when they were fed on restricted intake.","PeriodicalId":355358,"journal":{"name":"Menoufia Journal of Animal Poultry and Fish Production","volume":"165 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menoufia Journal of Animal Poultry and Fish Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjapfp.2020.122561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forty-eight adult local desert non-pregnant and non-lactating females, age 4-5 yrs.; Barki sheep (n= 16 and average body weight 34.53 ±1.56 kg), Balady goats (n= 16 and average body weight 31.11 ± 1.63 kg), and Shami goats (n=16 and average body weight 28.08±0.92 kg) were used to study effects of long-term restricted feeding regime on body weight changes and balance of energy and protein. Animals of each species were allocated to two levels of feed intake; control feeding treatment (CON) where animals fed a diet at a level of feeding to meet approximately the metabolizable energy for maintenance requirement (MEm), while those on the other dietary treatment was fed almost 50% of these quantities on a BW basis, termed as the restricted treatment (restricted; RES). Alfalfa hay and concentrate feed mixture (50:50% as DM basis) were given based on requirement recommendations. The results could be summarized as follows: 1-Comparison between Balady goats (BG) and Sheep (SH): The ADG was not affected (P<0.05) by animal species (BG vs. SH), however, it was affected (P<0.01) by feed intake level where the RES animal group showed a negative ADG (-65.6 g/d) compared with the CON group that achieved positive ADG (36.4 g/d). Both of SH and BG had similar negative energy balance (EB) values (67.0 vs. 61.4 KJ/ kg0.75/d, for BG and SH respectively). Nitrogen balance (NB) was greater (P<0.01) for SH (107.64 mg/kg0.75/d ) vs. BG (89.47 mg/kg0.75/d) and was greater (P<0.01) for animals fed on CON intake (251.47 vs. 208.55 mg/kg0.75/d, respectively) than those fed on RES intake (-36.18 vs. -29.62 mg/kg0.75/d, respectively), which gave a negative NB. 2.Comparison between Balady goats (BG)and Shami goats (SG): The ADG was not affected (P< 0.05) by animal species (BG vs. SG) being corresponding values 45.1 and 40.6 g/d respectively. However, ADG was affected (P< 0.001) by feed intake level where the RES animal group showed a negative ADG (-55.6 g/d) compared with the CON group that achieved positive ADG (30.1 g/d). Under CON intake, EB was an insignificant decrease in SG compared to BG. However, under RES intake both BG and SG had a negative energy balance (kJ/kg0.75/day) and it was lower (P<0.01) in SG than that in BG. Animals fed on the CON intake level had a greater (P<0.01) value for EB compared to those fed on RES intake and the latter gave a negative balance. Nitrogen balance (NB, mg/kg0.75/day) was a trend to be greater (P<0.10) for SG vs. BG. Also, animals under the CON intake level captured more nitrogen than their counterparts, which lost a large amount of nitrogen. Also, the retention N was increased (P<0.01) in SG than BG under the CON intake level, however, all breeds were lost N under the RES intake level especially in SG (-76.37) followed by BG (-29.62). It could be concluded that with hot conditions, sheep may have an advantage in a decreased Metabolizable energy for maintenance (MEm) requirement and reduction in heat production of a magnitude adequate to maintain body weight. There is a similar rate of using the energy between sheep and goats with moderate or limited nutrition planes. It is clear that Balady goats are better than Shami goats in their ability to reduce the energy expenditure via reducing the rate of metabolism when they were fed on restricted intake.
限制摄食条件下反刍动物的能量平衡
48只当地沙漠未怀孕和未哺乳的成年雌性,年龄4-5岁;以巴尔基羊(n=16,平均体重34.53±1.56 kg)、巴拉迪山羊(n=16,平均体重31.11±1.63 kg)和沙米山羊(n=16,平均体重28.08±0.92 kg)为试验对象,研究长期限饲制度对体重变化及能量蛋白质平衡的影响。每种动物被分配到两个采食量水平;对照饲喂处理(CON),在该处理中,动物的饲粮摄取量约为维持所需代谢能(MEm)的水平,而其他饲粮处理的动物则以体重为基础,摄取量约为上述水平的50%,称为限制饲喂处理(restricted;RES)。按需要量推荐饲喂苜蓿干草和精料混合物(以50:50% DM为基础)。结果如下:1 .巴拉迪山羊(BG)与绵羊(SH)的比较:平均日增重不受动物种类(BG vs. SH)的影响(P<0.05),但受采食量水平的影响(P<0.01), RES组的平均日增重为负(-65.6 g/d), CON组为正(36.4 g/d)。SH和BG具有相似的负能量平衡(EB)值(BG和SH分别为67.0 KJ/ kg0.75/d)。SH (107.64 mg/kg0.75/d)高于BG (89.47 mg/kg0.75/d), CON (251.47 mg/kg0.75/d)高于RES (-36.18 mg/kg0.75/d) (-29.62 mg/kg0.75/d),均为负NB。2.巴拉迪山羊(BG)与沙米山羊(SG)的比较:不同动物种类对平均日增重的影响不显著(P< 0.05),分别为45.1 g/d和40.6 g/d。然而,采食量水平对平均日增重有影响(P< 0.001), RES组平均日增重为负(-55.6 g/d), CON组平均日增重为正(30.1 g/d)。在CON摄入下,与BG相比,EB对SG的影响不显著。而在RES摄取量下,BG和SG均呈负能量平衡(kJ/kg0.75/d),且SG低于BG (P<0.01)。采食CON水平的动物EB值高于采食RES水平的动物(P<0.01),后者呈负平衡。氮平衡(NB, mg/kg0.75/d)有增大趋势(P<0.10)。此外,在CON摄入水平下的动物比其他动物捕获了更多的氮,而后者则损失了大量的氮。在CON水平下,SG的N保留量显著高于BG (P<0.01),但在RES水平下,所有品种的N损失均显著高于SG(-76.37),其次是BG(-29.62)。由此可见,在高温条件下,绵羊在维持代谢能(MEm)需要量降低和产热量减少方面可能具有优势,而产热量的减少足以维持体重。中等或有限营养水平的绵羊和山羊的能量利用率相似。很明显,巴拉迪山羊比沙米山羊在限制摄入时通过降低新陈代谢率来减少能量消耗的能力更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信