View of Human Beings in Daesoon Thought viewed from the Perennial Philosophy: Focusing on Kant’s Anthropology

Hoon Heo
{"title":"View of Human Beings in Daesoon Thought viewed from the Perennial Philosophy: Focusing on Kant’s Anthropology","authors":"Hoon Heo","doi":"10.25050/jdaos.2018.30.0.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to examine the main concepts of human beings established by the saints and wise men in the Perennial Philosophy, and to reveal that the human view of Perennial Philosophy is consistent with the view of human beings of Daesoon Thought. In addition, Kant, who synthesizes Western modern philosophy, also sets out the ultimate goal of his philosophy of identifying human beings, wherein Kant asks what human beings are. The view of human beings in the Daesoon Thought reveals one kind of answer that can be given to Kant’s anthropological question. If we compare this idea with that of the Western world (a Kantian view of humanity) based on this Perennial Philosophy, the characteristics of Daesoon Thought can be revealed clearly. Kant set the ultimate goal of his philosophy to answer the question, “What is man?” With regards to this, he posits four questions: 1) What can I know? 2) What should I do? 3) What can I hope for? 4) What are human beings? And Kant says that the fourth question (related to anthropology) * 중앙대학교 (전) 강사, E-mail: huhhoon@sen.go.kr 62 󰠐대순사상논총 제30집 / 연구논문 involves three other questions. However, he does not offer up his own definition of human existence anywhere in his works. He regarded humans as being rational, and he did not think that humans had any special cognitive ability to intuit into humanity itself. In the end, Kant leaves the human being as a sort of unknown entity. On the other hand, The concept of humanity in Daesoon Thought (Perennial Philosophy) can provide a straightforward answer to Kant’s question. This possible is because human beings in Daesoon Thought are not seen as different from the Dao (道) or deities (神), which can be called the essence of ultimate reality. From the perspective of Daesoon Thought, humans have divine cognitive abilities. In Perennial Philosophy, this could be the best way to simultaneously lead the object of mind and cognition to the divine Ground. Humans have special cognitive or perceptual abilities. The ultimate identity of every person is God. The realization of the divine being by finding one’s true nature as a human being (the self) and the essence of the enlightenment of those who have shown this special intellectual intuition through training are both outcomes found at the core of perennial philosophy. These can be expressed clearly and obviously through the essence of Daesoon Thought.","PeriodicalId":115590,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25050/jdaos.2018.30.0.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the main concepts of human beings established by the saints and wise men in the Perennial Philosophy, and to reveal that the human view of Perennial Philosophy is consistent with the view of human beings of Daesoon Thought. In addition, Kant, who synthesizes Western modern philosophy, also sets out the ultimate goal of his philosophy of identifying human beings, wherein Kant asks what human beings are. The view of human beings in the Daesoon Thought reveals one kind of answer that can be given to Kant’s anthropological question. If we compare this idea with that of the Western world (a Kantian view of humanity) based on this Perennial Philosophy, the characteristics of Daesoon Thought can be revealed clearly. Kant set the ultimate goal of his philosophy to answer the question, “What is man?” With regards to this, he posits four questions: 1) What can I know? 2) What should I do? 3) What can I hope for? 4) What are human beings? And Kant says that the fourth question (related to anthropology) * 중앙대학교 (전) 강사, E-mail: huhhoon@sen.go.kr 62 󰠐대순사상논총 제30집 / 연구논문 involves three other questions. However, he does not offer up his own definition of human existence anywhere in his works. He regarded humans as being rational, and he did not think that humans had any special cognitive ability to intuit into humanity itself. In the end, Kant leaves the human being as a sort of unknown entity. On the other hand, The concept of humanity in Daesoon Thought (Perennial Philosophy) can provide a straightforward answer to Kant’s question. This possible is because human beings in Daesoon Thought are not seen as different from the Dao (道) or deities (神), which can be called the essence of ultimate reality. From the perspective of Daesoon Thought, humans have divine cognitive abilities. In Perennial Philosophy, this could be the best way to simultaneously lead the object of mind and cognition to the divine Ground. Humans have special cognitive or perceptual abilities. The ultimate identity of every person is God. The realization of the divine being by finding one’s true nature as a human being (the self) and the essence of the enlightenment of those who have shown this special intellectual intuition through training are both outcomes found at the core of perennial philosophy. These can be expressed clearly and obviously through the essence of Daesoon Thought.
从《永恒哲学》看大宣思想的人性观——以康德的人类学为中心
本研究旨在检视《永续哲学》中圣人和智者所确立的主要人的概念,并揭示永续哲学的人性观与大宣思想的人性观是一致的。此外,综合了西方现代哲学的康德也提出了他的哲学的最终目标,即人是什么。大宣思想的人性观为康德的人类学问题提供了一种答案。如果将这种思想与以这种“永恒哲学”为基础的西方世界的思想(康德的人性观)进行比较,就可以清楚地看出大顺思想的特点。康德将其哲学的终极目标设定为回答“人是什么?”对此,他提出了四个问题:1)我能知道什么?2)我该怎么办?3)还能指望什么?4)人是什么?康德说,第四个问题(有关人类学)*중앙대학교(전)강사,电子邮件:huhhoon@sen.go.kr 62󰠐대순사상논총제30집/연구논문涉及三个问题。然而,他并没有在他的作品中提出自己对人类存在的定义。他认为人类是理性的,他不认为人类有任何特殊的认知能力来直观地了解人性本身。最后,康德把人作为一种未知的实体。另一方面,“永恒哲学”中的人性概念可以直接回答康德的问题。这是可能的,因为在大顺思想中,人类并没有被视为与道或神不同,而道或神可以被称为终极现实的本质。从大宣思想的角度来看,人类具有神圣的认知能力。在永恒哲学中,这可能是同时把精神对象和认识对象引向神圣根据的最好方法。人类有特殊的认知或感知能力。每个人的最终身份是上帝。通过发现一个人作为一个人的真实本性(自我)来实现神圣的存在,以及那些通过训练表现出这种特殊智力直觉的人的启蒙本质,都是永恒哲学核心的结果。这些都可以通过大宣思想的本质清晰而明显地表达出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信