MULTI-DIMENSIONAL MODEL FOR FLOOD VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT IN MOKWA: A CASE OF DOWNSTREAM COMMUNITIES OF KAINJI DAM, NIGER STATE, NIGERIA

Z. A. Ndanusa, I. J. Musa, A. A. Hudu, A. ISAMA'IL
{"title":"MULTI-DIMENSIONAL MODEL FOR FLOOD VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT IN MOKWA: A CASE OF DOWNSTREAM COMMUNITIES OF KAINJI DAM, NIGER STATE, NIGERIA","authors":"Z. A. Ndanusa, I. J. Musa, A. A. Hudu, A. ISAMA'IL","doi":"10.54030/2788-564x/2022/v2s3a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most devastating and expensive natural hazards in the world today is flooding. Hence, several attempts have been made by different scholars and researchers across the globe and in Nigeria to study flood vulnerability. These studies focused on assessing either the physical or social components of vulnerability without a holistic assessment of all vulnerability components. A multi-dimensional approach to flood risk assessment is required to provide a holistic view of residents’ degree of vulnerability to flooding. However, where the multidimensional approach was adopted the result were aggregated and not localized to specific areas. Therefore, this study attempts to quantify the vulnerability indicators using the participatory approach and develop a multi-dimensional approach for flood vulnerability assessment in Mokwa, Nigeria. Vulnerability was explored through the lens of four dimensions (economic, environmental, physical, and social) and eighteen indicators. The indicators were scrutinized and standardized for easy aggregation and comparability. The indicators were weighted unequally using Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP). Nine communities and 382 households were selected purposively from the downstream area of the Kainji dam for sampling. The data collected were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics using XLSTAT (2014) and spatial analysis in ARCGIS 10.7 environment. The flood vulnerability index revealed that the communities experienced high flood vulnerability from all dimensions; economic (0.71), physical (0.66), social (0.62), and environmental (0.57). The study reported a multi-dimensional flood vulnerability index of 0.65, which implies a high level of vulnerability to flooding. This study has found significant variations in all dimensions of vulnerability among the communities. The study concludes that the multi-dimensional approach to flood vulnerability provides information on the vulnerable population as well as the factors driving vulnerability in the area. The study recommends the use of a multi-dimensional approach, sophisticated models, site-specific indicators, and fine-resolution satellite data for future vulnerability assessment.","PeriodicalId":444854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inclusive Cities and Built Environment","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inclusive Cities and Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54030/2788-564x/2022/v2s3a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most devastating and expensive natural hazards in the world today is flooding. Hence, several attempts have been made by different scholars and researchers across the globe and in Nigeria to study flood vulnerability. These studies focused on assessing either the physical or social components of vulnerability without a holistic assessment of all vulnerability components. A multi-dimensional approach to flood risk assessment is required to provide a holistic view of residents’ degree of vulnerability to flooding. However, where the multidimensional approach was adopted the result were aggregated and not localized to specific areas. Therefore, this study attempts to quantify the vulnerability indicators using the participatory approach and develop a multi-dimensional approach for flood vulnerability assessment in Mokwa, Nigeria. Vulnerability was explored through the lens of four dimensions (economic, environmental, physical, and social) and eighteen indicators. The indicators were scrutinized and standardized for easy aggregation and comparability. The indicators were weighted unequally using Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP). Nine communities and 382 households were selected purposively from the downstream area of the Kainji dam for sampling. The data collected were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics using XLSTAT (2014) and spatial analysis in ARCGIS 10.7 environment. The flood vulnerability index revealed that the communities experienced high flood vulnerability from all dimensions; economic (0.71), physical (0.66), social (0.62), and environmental (0.57). The study reported a multi-dimensional flood vulnerability index of 0.65, which implies a high level of vulnerability to flooding. This study has found significant variations in all dimensions of vulnerability among the communities. The study concludes that the multi-dimensional approach to flood vulnerability provides information on the vulnerable population as well as the factors driving vulnerability in the area. The study recommends the use of a multi-dimensional approach, sophisticated models, site-specific indicators, and fine-resolution satellite data for future vulnerability assessment.
莫克瓦地区洪水脆弱性评价的多维模型——以尼日利亚尼日尔州kainji大坝下游社区为例
当今世界上最具破坏性和最昂贵的自然灾害之一是洪水。因此,全球和尼日利亚的不同学者和研究人员进行了几次尝试来研究洪水的脆弱性。这些研究侧重于评估脆弱性的物质或社会组成部分,而没有对所有脆弱性组成部分进行全面评估。我们需要一种多维度的洪水风险评估方法,以全面了解居民易受洪水影响的程度。然而,在采用多维方法的地方,结果是汇总的,而不是局限于特定的区域。因此,本研究试图利用参与式方法对脆弱性指标进行量化,并为尼日利亚Mokwa的洪水脆弱性评估开发一种多维度方法。脆弱性是通过四个维度(经济、环境、物理和社会)和18个指标来探讨的。这些指标经过仔细审查和标准化,以便于汇总和比较。采用层次分析法(AHP)对各指标进行不等加权。在建济大坝下游地区有目的地选取9个社区和382户进行抽样。收集的数据采用XLSTAT(2014)进行描述性统计和推理统计,并在ARCGIS 10.7环境下进行空间分析。洪涝脆弱性指数显示,各维度的洪涝脆弱性均较高;经济(0.71),物理(0.66),社会(0.62)和环境(0.57)。该研究报告的多维洪水脆弱性指数为0.65,表明该地区具有较高的洪水脆弱性。这项研究发现,各社区在脆弱性的各个方面都存在显著差异。研究认为,洪水脆弱性的多维度分析方法提供了该地区脆弱人口及其脆弱性驱动因素的信息。该研究建议在未来的脆弱性评估中使用多维方法、复杂模型、特定地点指标和高分辨率卫星数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信