Ułuda wspólnotowości. Polski badacz na Syberii

E. Nowicka
{"title":"Ułuda wspólnotowości.\nPolski badacz na Syberii","authors":"E. Nowicka","doi":"10.55226/uw.s-c.2021.32.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the author’s experience in long-term field research among the Sakha\n(Yakuts) and Buryats, the indigenous peoples of Eastern Siberia, the article\ndeals with the complications of the field anthropologist’s thinking that they\nshould not only understand but also share the mental structures of their subjects.\nWhen these subjects were or still are the object of someone else’s colonial\nsuperpower policy, the researcher feels absolutely obliged to be an advocate,\na defender of their subjects. However, along with the sense of\nunderstanding and empathy, doubt arises when the researcher is openly criticised\nand the oppressors are presented in a positive light. In Siberia such is the\ncase with the sympathising attitude to the myth of the “Great Patriotic War”.","PeriodicalId":259331,"journal":{"name":"Azja Centralna. In memoriam Stanisław Zapaśnik","volume":"507 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Azja Centralna. In memoriam Stanisław Zapaśnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55226/uw.s-c.2021.32.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the author’s experience in long-term field research among the Sakha (Yakuts) and Buryats, the indigenous peoples of Eastern Siberia, the article deals with the complications of the field anthropologist’s thinking that they should not only understand but also share the mental structures of their subjects. When these subjects were or still are the object of someone else’s colonial superpower policy, the researcher feels absolutely obliged to be an advocate, a defender of their subjects. However, along with the sense of understanding and empathy, doubt arises when the researcher is openly criticised and the oppressors are presented in a positive light. In Siberia such is the case with the sympathising attitude to the myth of the “Great Patriotic War”.
本文根据作者对东西伯利亚土著民族萨哈人(雅库特人)和布里亚特人进行长期田野研究的经验,论述了田野人类学家不仅要理解而且要分享其研究对象的心理结构的复杂思想。当这些研究对象过去是或现在仍然是别人的殖民超级大国政策的对象时,研究人员绝对有义务成为他们研究对象的倡导者和捍卫者。然而,随着理解和同理心的产生,当研究者被公开批评,压迫者被积极地呈现出来时,怀疑就产生了。在西伯利亚,对“卫国战争”神话的同情态度就是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信