The Impact of Vertical Integration on Physician Behavior and Healthcare Delivery: Evidence from Gastroenterology Practices

S. Saghafian, Lina Song, J. Newhouse, M. Landrum, J. Hsu
{"title":"The Impact of Vertical Integration on Physician Behavior and Healthcare Delivery: Evidence from Gastroenterology Practices","authors":"S. Saghafian, Lina Song, J. Newhouse, M. Landrum, J. Hsu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3704941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. healthcare system is undergoing a period of substantial change with hospitals purchasing many physician practices (“vertical integration”). In theory, this vertical integration could improve quality by promoting care coordination but could also worsen it by impacting the care delivery patterns. The evidence quantifying these effects is limited because of the lack of understanding of how physicians’ behaviors alter in response to the changes in financial ownership and incentive structures of the integrated organizations. We study the impact of vertical integration by examining Medicare patients treated by gastroenterologists, a specialty with a large outpatient volume and a recent increase in vertical integration. Using a causal model and large-scale patient-level national panel data that includes 2.6 million patient visits across 5,488 physicians, we examine changes in various measures of care delivery. We find that physicians significantly alter their care process (e.g., in using anesthesia with deep sedation) after they vertically integrate, and there is a substantial increase in patients’ postprocedure complications. We further provide evidence that the financial incentive structure of the integrated practices is the main reason for the changes in physician behavior because it discourages the integrated practices from allocating expensive resources to relatively unprofitable procedures. We also find that, although integration improves operational efficiency (e.g., measured by physicians’ throughput), it negatively affects quality and overall spending. Finally, to shed light on potential mechanisms through which policymakers can mitigate the negative consequences of vertical integration, we perform both mediation and cost-effectiveness analyses and highlight some useful policy levers. This paper was accepted by Stefan Scholtes, healthcare management. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4886 .","PeriodicalId":256597,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Health Care Approaches (Sub-Topic)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Health Care Approaches (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3704941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The U.S. healthcare system is undergoing a period of substantial change with hospitals purchasing many physician practices (“vertical integration”). In theory, this vertical integration could improve quality by promoting care coordination but could also worsen it by impacting the care delivery patterns. The evidence quantifying these effects is limited because of the lack of understanding of how physicians’ behaviors alter in response to the changes in financial ownership and incentive structures of the integrated organizations. We study the impact of vertical integration by examining Medicare patients treated by gastroenterologists, a specialty with a large outpatient volume and a recent increase in vertical integration. Using a causal model and large-scale patient-level national panel data that includes 2.6 million patient visits across 5,488 physicians, we examine changes in various measures of care delivery. We find that physicians significantly alter their care process (e.g., in using anesthesia with deep sedation) after they vertically integrate, and there is a substantial increase in patients’ postprocedure complications. We further provide evidence that the financial incentive structure of the integrated practices is the main reason for the changes in physician behavior because it discourages the integrated practices from allocating expensive resources to relatively unprofitable procedures. We also find that, although integration improves operational efficiency (e.g., measured by physicians’ throughput), it negatively affects quality and overall spending. Finally, to shed light on potential mechanisms through which policymakers can mitigate the negative consequences of vertical integration, we perform both mediation and cost-effectiveness analyses and highlight some useful policy levers. This paper was accepted by Stefan Scholtes, healthcare management. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4886 .
垂直整合对医生行为和医疗服务的影响:来自胃肠病学实践的证据
美国的医疗保健系统正在经历一段时间的实质性变化,医院购买许多医生的做法(“垂直整合”)。理论上,这种垂直整合可以通过促进护理协调来提高质量,但也可能由于影响护理提供模式而使质量恶化。量化这些影响的证据是有限的,因为缺乏对医生的行为如何随着综合组织的财务所有权和激励结构的变化而改变的理解。我们研究垂直整合的影响,通过检查由胃肠病学家治疗的医疗保险患者,这是一个门诊量很大的专业,最近垂直整合有所增加。使用因果模型和大规模患者水平的全国面板数据,包括5,488名医生的260万患者就诊,我们检查了各种护理措施的变化。我们发现,医生在垂直整合后显著改变了他们的护理过程(例如,在使用麻醉和深度镇静),并且患者的术后并发症大幅增加。我们进一步提供证据表明,综合实践的财务激励结构是医生行为变化的主要原因,因为它阻止了综合实践将昂贵的资源分配给相对无利可图的程序。我们还发现,尽管整合提高了运营效率(例如,通过医生的吞吐量来衡量),但它对质量和总体支出产生了负面影响。最后,为了阐明政策制定者减轻垂直一体化负面影响的潜在机制,我们进行了中介和成本效益分析,并强调了一些有用的政策杠杆。本文被医疗管理专业的Stefan Scholtes接受。补充材料:在线附录和数据可在https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4886上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信