Comparison of dexamethasone with local anaesthetic versus local anaesthetic for laparoscopic port infiltration to assess effectiveness for post-operative analgesia

Md. Ariful Hoque, Shamima Nasrin Shadia, Moazzem Hossain
{"title":"Comparison of dexamethasone with local anaesthetic versus local anaesthetic for laparoscopic port infiltration to assess effectiveness for post-operative analgesia","authors":"Md. Ariful Hoque, Shamima Nasrin Shadia, Moazzem Hossain","doi":"10.56355/ijfrcp.2022.1.1.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early postoperative pain remains the most prevalent complaint after any surgery. Beside conventional IV analgesic medications, subcutaneous infiltration has been established as a reliable pain relief technique. Addition of dexamethasone to local anaesthetic (example: bupivacaine, lidocaine) can also be used as it has some beneficial effect than use of bupivacaine only. The objectives of this study to evaluate the duration of analgesic effects of dexamethasone with local anaesthetic as compared to local anaesthetic in post operative patient. This Randomized controlled trial study was conducted among 60 patients who underwent Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study was conducted from January,2019 to June,2019. All patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery were selected by purposive sampling. Data were compiled, edited, analyzed. The SPSS version 23 was used for data analysis. In this study distributing the patient in demographic changes, age, sex, BMI do not show any significant change. Most Group 2 patients have long analgesia effect (NRS score more than 5), delay requirement of first rescue analgesia. NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) score in Group 2 were persistently lower than that of Group 1. This revealed that combination of Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone is quite effective in reducing postoperative port site pain in comparison to Bupivacaine (P=<0.001).","PeriodicalId":431989,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Frontline Research in Chemistry and Pharmacy","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Frontline Research in Chemistry and Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56355/ijfrcp.2022.1.1.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early postoperative pain remains the most prevalent complaint after any surgery. Beside conventional IV analgesic medications, subcutaneous infiltration has been established as a reliable pain relief technique. Addition of dexamethasone to local anaesthetic (example: bupivacaine, lidocaine) can also be used as it has some beneficial effect than use of bupivacaine only. The objectives of this study to evaluate the duration of analgesic effects of dexamethasone with local anaesthetic as compared to local anaesthetic in post operative patient. This Randomized controlled trial study was conducted among 60 patients who underwent Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study was conducted from January,2019 to June,2019. All patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery were selected by purposive sampling. Data were compiled, edited, analyzed. The SPSS version 23 was used for data analysis. In this study distributing the patient in demographic changes, age, sex, BMI do not show any significant change. Most Group 2 patients have long analgesia effect (NRS score more than 5), delay requirement of first rescue analgesia. NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) score in Group 2 were persistently lower than that of Group 1. This revealed that combination of Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone is quite effective in reducing postoperative port site pain in comparison to Bupivacaine (P=<0.001).
地塞米松局部麻醉与局部麻醉在腹腔镜气道浸润术后镇痛效果的比较
术后早期疼痛仍然是任何手术后最普遍的主诉。除了传统的静脉镇痛药物外,皮下浸润已被认为是一种可靠的镇痛技术。局部麻醉(如布比卡因、利多卡因)也可加入地塞米松,因为它比只使用布比卡因有一些有益的效果。本研究的目的是评价地塞米松局部麻醉与局部麻醉对术后患者镇痛效果的持续时间。本随机对照试验研究在60例接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中进行。本研究于2019年1月至2019年6月进行。所有行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者均采用有目的抽样。对数据进行汇编、编辑和分析。数据分析采用SPSS第23版。本研究中患者分布在人口统计学上的变化,年龄、性别、BMI均未显示出明显变化。多数2组患者镇痛效果较长(NRS评分大于5分),首次抢救镇痛要求延迟。2组的NRS评分持续低于1组。这表明,与布比卡因相比,布比卡因联合地塞米松在减少术后端口疼痛方面非常有效(P=<0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信