Papel de la imagen de movimiento incoherente intravóxel (IVIM) en la evaluación de la respuesta del carcinoma hepatocelular después de la quimioembolización transarterial (TACE): un estudio prospectivo

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
M. Reddy Bursapalle , J. Valakkadaa , A. Ayappan
{"title":"Papel de la imagen de movimiento incoherente intravóxel (IVIM) en la evaluación de la respuesta del carcinoma hepatocelular después de la quimioembolización transarterial (TACE): un estudio prospectivo","authors":"M. Reddy Bursapalle ,&nbsp;J. Valakkadaa ,&nbsp;A. Ayappan","doi":"10.1016/j.rx.2022.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Response evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) currently is based on arterial phase enhancement which doesn’t take into microstructural changes in the tumor after trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE).</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This prospective study was conducted to assess the feasibility and efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion imaging (IVIM) in response evaluation of HCC after TACE.</p><p>39 cirrhotic patients with 48 HCC underwent MR imaging 1 week within and 6<!--> <!-->weeks after TACE. IVIM parameters like D<sub>slow</sub> (true diffusion), D<sub>fast</sub> (pseudodiffusion), perfusion fraction and ADC were measured prior to and postTACE. The pre and postTACE values in LR-TR (LIRADS-treatment response) nonviable and viable lesions were compared using paired t-tests. ROC curve analysis was done to calculate sensitivity and specificity and propose cut-off values.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Non-viable lesions showed a significant increase in D<sub>slow</sub> (1.208<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.581 vs. 1.560<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.494, p-value –0.0207) and ADC (1.37<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.53 vs. 1.65<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.4287, p-value 0.016) after TACE. There was also significant decrease in Dfast (33.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10.4 vs. 23.75<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12.13, p-value 0.0005) and f (19.92<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10.54 vs. 12.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10.41, p-value 0.012) values after TACE in non-viable lesions compared to viable lesions. The change in true diffusion had the highest AUC (0.741) among IVIM parameters with greater than 0.075 increase between preTACE and postTACE values having a sensitivity and specificity of 81.8% and 60% respectively for complete response.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IVIM imaging is feasible to assess the response in HCC after TACE. True diffusion is more sensitive and specific than apparent diffusion in evaluating the response.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":31509,"journal":{"name":"RADIOLOGIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RADIOLOGIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033833822002211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Response evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) currently is based on arterial phase enhancement which doesn’t take into microstructural changes in the tumor after trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Aim

This prospective study was conducted to assess the feasibility and efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion imaging (IVIM) in response evaluation of HCC after TACE.

39 cirrhotic patients with 48 HCC underwent MR imaging 1 week within and 6 weeks after TACE. IVIM parameters like Dslow (true diffusion), Dfast (pseudodiffusion), perfusion fraction and ADC were measured prior to and postTACE. The pre and postTACE values in LR-TR (LIRADS-treatment response) nonviable and viable lesions were compared using paired t-tests. ROC curve analysis was done to calculate sensitivity and specificity and propose cut-off values.

Result

Non-viable lesions showed a significant increase in Dslow (1.208 ± 0.581 vs. 1.560 ± 0.494, p-value –0.0207) and ADC (1.37 ± 0.53 vs. 1.65 ± 0.4287, p-value 0.016) after TACE. There was also significant decrease in Dfast (33.7 ± 10.4 vs. 23.75 ± 12.13, p-value 0.0005) and f (19.92 ± 10.54 vs. 12.9 ± 10.41, p-value 0.012) values after TACE in non-viable lesions compared to viable lesions. The change in true diffusion had the highest AUC (0.741) among IVIM parameters with greater than 0.075 increase between preTACE and postTACE values having a sensitivity and specificity of 81.8% and 60% respectively for complete response.

Conclusion

IVIM imaging is feasible to assess the response in HCC after TACE. True diffusion is more sensitive and specific than apparent diffusion in evaluating the response.

经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)后体内非相干运动成像(IVIM)在评估肝细胞癌反应中的作用:一项前瞻性研究。
这项前瞻性研究旨在评估体细胞内非相干运动成像(IVIM)在肝细胞癌TACE术后反应评估中的可行性和有效性。39名患有48例肝细胞癌的肝硬化患者在TACE术前1周和术后6周接受了磁共振成像。在 TACE 之前和之后测量了 IVIM 参数,如 Dslow(真扩散)、Dfast(假扩散)、灌注分数和 ADC。使用配对 t 检验比较 LR-TR(LIRADS-治疗反应)非存活病灶和存活病灶的 TACE 前后值。结果非存活病变在 TACE 后 Dslow(1.208 ± 0.581 vs. 1.560 ± 0.494,P 值 -0.0207)和 ADC(1.37 ± 0.53 vs. 1.65 ± 0.4287,P 值 0.016)显著增加。与有活力的病灶相比,TACE 后无活力病灶的 Dfast 值(33.7 ± 10.4 vs. 23.75 ± 12.13,p 值 0.0005)和 f 值(19.92 ± 10.54 vs. 12.9 ± 10.41,p 值 0.012)也明显下降。在 IVIM 参数中,真实弥散的变化具有最高的 AUC(0.741),TACE 前和 TACE 后的数值增加大于 0.075,对完全反应的敏感性和特异性分别为 81.8% 和 60%。在评估反应方面,真实弥散比表观弥散更敏感、更特异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RADIOLOGIA
RADIOLOGIA RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: La mejor revista para conocer de primera mano los originales más relevantes en la especialidad y las revisiones, casos y notas clínicas de mayor interés profesional. Además es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Radiología Médica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信