Between Symbolism and Incrementalism: Moving Forward with the Gender Equality Project in Poland

A. Śledzińska-Simon, Adam Bodnar
{"title":"Between Symbolism and Incrementalism: Moving Forward with the Gender Equality Project in Poland","authors":"A. Śledzińska-Simon, Adam Bodnar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2611904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the recently adopted law on gender electoral quotas marks a change in the approach to gender issues and gender equality in Poland. It also aims to describe the trajectory of women’s movement in a post-Communist country and to identify causes related to the role of women in the Solidarity movement that resulted in low visibility of women in government and decision-making positions. The paper departs from the assumption that Poland is not moving away from a narrowly conceived equal rights/opportunities model, because such model has not yet been fully implemented. In the context of the present ‘war on gender’, women’s full political, economic, social, and more specifically, private citizenship is a long-term project. As of now, women remain instrumental for achieving political parties’ further aims, and any gestures that seem to advance women’s position in the public sphere are usually merely symbolic. Yet, the emergence of a strong women’s movement helps to frame the public discourse in gendered terms and gradually include its propositions in the mainstream policy.","PeriodicalId":405681,"journal":{"name":"European University Institute (EUI) Legal Research Paper Series","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European University Institute (EUI) Legal Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2611904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the recently adopted law on gender electoral quotas marks a change in the approach to gender issues and gender equality in Poland. It also aims to describe the trajectory of women’s movement in a post-Communist country and to identify causes related to the role of women in the Solidarity movement that resulted in low visibility of women in government and decision-making positions. The paper departs from the assumption that Poland is not moving away from a narrowly conceived equal rights/opportunities model, because such model has not yet been fully implemented. In the context of the present ‘war on gender’, women’s full political, economic, social, and more specifically, private citizenship is a long-term project. As of now, women remain instrumental for achieving political parties’ further aims, and any gestures that seem to advance women’s position in the public sphere are usually merely symbolic. Yet, the emergence of a strong women’s movement helps to frame the public discourse in gendered terms and gradually include its propositions in the mainstream policy.
在象征主义和渐进主义之间:在波兰推进性别平等项目
本文的目的是审查最近通过的关于性别选举配额的法律是否标志着波兰在处理性别问题和性别平等方面的变化。它还旨在描述后共产主义国家妇女运动的轨迹,并查明与妇女在团结工会运动中所起作用有关的原因,该运动导致妇女在政府和决策职位上的可见度较低。该文件偏离了波兰没有摆脱狭隘的平等权利/机会模式的假设,因为这种模式尚未得到充分实施。在当前“性别战争”的背景下,妇女全面的政治、经济、社会,更具体地说,私人公民身份是一项长期工程。到目前为止,女性仍然是实现政党进一步目标的工具,任何似乎提高女性在公共领域地位的姿态通常只是象征性的。然而,强大的妇女运动的出现有助于构建性别化的公共话语,并逐渐将其主张纳入主流政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信