Learning analytics performance improvement design (LAPID) in higher education: Framework and concerns

Amir Winer, N. Geri
{"title":"Learning analytics performance improvement design (LAPID) in higher education: Framework and concerns","authors":"Amir Winer, N. Geri","doi":"10.36965/ojakm.2019.7(2)41-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning Analytics Dashboards (LAD) promise to disrupt the Higher Education (HE) teaching practice. Current LAD research portrays a near future of e-teaching, empowered with the ability to predict dropouts, to validate timely pedagogical interventions and to close the instructional design loop. These dashboards utilize machine learning, big data technologies, sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, and interactive visualization techniques. However, alongside with the desired impact, research is raising significant ethical concerns, context-specific limitations and difficulties to design multipurpose solutions. We revisit the practice of managing by the numbers and the theoretical origins of dashboards within management as a call to reevaluate the “datafication” of learning environments. More specifically, we highlight potential risks of using predictive dashboards as black boxes to instrumentalize and reduce learning and teaching to what we call “teaching by the numbers”. Instead, we suggest guidelines for teachers’ LAD design, that support the visual description of actual learning, based on teachers’ prescriptive pedagogical intent. We conclude with a new user-driven framework for future LAD research that supports a Learning Analytics Performance Improvement Design (LAPID).","PeriodicalId":325473,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36965/ojakm.2019.7(2)41-55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Learning Analytics Dashboards (LAD) promise to disrupt the Higher Education (HE) teaching practice. Current LAD research portrays a near future of e-teaching, empowered with the ability to predict dropouts, to validate timely pedagogical interventions and to close the instructional design loop. These dashboards utilize machine learning, big data technologies, sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, and interactive visualization techniques. However, alongside with the desired impact, research is raising significant ethical concerns, context-specific limitations and difficulties to design multipurpose solutions. We revisit the practice of managing by the numbers and the theoretical origins of dashboards within management as a call to reevaluate the “datafication” of learning environments. More specifically, we highlight potential risks of using predictive dashboards as black boxes to instrumentalize and reduce learning and teaching to what we call “teaching by the numbers”. Instead, we suggest guidelines for teachers’ LAD design, that support the visual description of actual learning, based on teachers’ prescriptive pedagogical intent. We conclude with a new user-driven framework for future LAD research that supports a Learning Analytics Performance Improvement Design (LAPID).
高等教育中的学习分析绩效改进设计(LAPID):框架与关注点
学习分析仪表板(LAD)有望颠覆高等教育(HE)的教学实践。当前的LAD研究描绘了电子教学不久的未来,它具有预测辍学、验证及时的教学干预和关闭教学设计循环的能力。这些仪表板利用机器学习、大数据技术、复杂的人工智能(AI)算法和交互式可视化技术。然而,除了预期的影响,研究也引起了重大的伦理问题,具体情况的限制和设计多用途解决方案的困难。我们重新审视了数字管理的实践,以及管理中仪表板的理论起源,以此呼吁重新评估学习环境的“数据化”。更具体地说,我们强调使用预测性仪表板作为黑盒子的潜在风险,将学习和教学工具化并减少到我们所谓的“数字教学”。相反,我们建议教师的LAD设计指南,支持实际学习的视觉描述,基于教师的规定性教学意图。我们总结了一个新的用户驱动框架,用于未来的LAD研究,该框架支持学习分析性能改进设计(LAPID)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信