Delmos Jones and the End of Neutrality

Elgin L. Klugh
{"title":"Delmos Jones and the End of Neutrality","authors":"Elgin L. Klugh","doi":"10.5622/illinois/9780252042027.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Delmos Jones identified with the political marginality and socioeconomic struggles of his subjects and sought ways to direct anthropological research toward the dismantling of oppression and inequality. Jones was dissatisfied with the way theoretical paradigms, praxis, and outcomes in anthropological research were supportive of, or neutral to, oppressive ends. In the place of these practices and outcomes, he envisioned a praxis strongly committed to the goals of justice and equality for oppressed populations. This chapter explores Jones’s quest for an anthropology of equality and social justice through his discussions on the ethics of basic research and his theoretical contributions to native anthropology.","PeriodicalId":239795,"journal":{"name":"The Second Generation of African American Pioneers in Anthropology","volume":"294 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Second Generation of African American Pioneers in Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5622/illinois/9780252042027.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delmos Jones identified with the political marginality and socioeconomic struggles of his subjects and sought ways to direct anthropological research toward the dismantling of oppression and inequality. Jones was dissatisfied with the way theoretical paradigms, praxis, and outcomes in anthropological research were supportive of, or neutral to, oppressive ends. In the place of these practices and outcomes, he envisioned a praxis strongly committed to the goals of justice and equality for oppressed populations. This chapter explores Jones’s quest for an anthropology of equality and social justice through his discussions on the ethics of basic research and his theoretical contributions to native anthropology.
德尔莫斯·琼斯和中立的终结
德尔莫斯·琼斯认同他的研究对象的政治边缘化和社会经济斗争,并寻求将人类学研究引向消除压迫和不平等的方法。琼斯对人类学研究中的理论范式、实践和结果支持或中立压迫目的的方式感到不满。在这些做法和结果的地方,他设想了一种坚定致力于被压迫人民正义和平等目标的做法。本章通过对基础研究伦理的讨论和对本土人类学的理论贡献,探讨琼斯对平等和社会正义人类学的追求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信