Mekanisme Eksekusi Sita Jaminan Aset Kripto di Indonesia

Chiquita Andina Putri, Yati Nurhayati, Iwan Riswandie
{"title":"Mekanisme Eksekusi Sita Jaminan Aset Kripto di Indonesia","authors":"Chiquita Andina Putri, Yati Nurhayati, Iwan Riswandie","doi":"10.51749/jphi.v3i3.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cryptocurrency is a type of virtual currency that works similarly to real money and enables users to virtually send payments for transactions involving business. With the development of crypto assets today, several pawn and loan institutions accept crypto assets as collateral objects. In the case of pawning, default can also occur which requires that the collateral from the debtor be confiscated in the event of default. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal strength of crypto assets used as collateral objects and to find out the execution mechanism for crypto asset confiscation in Indonesia in the event of default. This study used a normative juridical research method for its research. The type of information used in this study is secondary information, specifically information found through library research. The result of this research is that crypto assets can be used as collateral objects, but not as main collateral. Crypto assets as collateral objects already have strong legal force, this is based on Book II of the Civil Code, Law no. 10 of 2011 concerning Amendments to Law Number 32 of 1997 concerning Commodity Futures Trading, Regulation of the Commodity Futures Trading Supervisory Agency Number 5 of 2019 concerning Technical Provisions for the Implementation of the Physical Crypto Asset Market on the Futures Exchange. In terms of regulating the confiscation of crypto assets, it can be said that currently in Indonesia itself there are no special regulations and special institutions that regulate the confiscation of crypto assets. But the process of confiscation of crypto assets can be carried out with procedures such as foreclosure of other material guarantees.","PeriodicalId":146948,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v3i3.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cryptocurrency is a type of virtual currency that works similarly to real money and enables users to virtually send payments for transactions involving business. With the development of crypto assets today, several pawn and loan institutions accept crypto assets as collateral objects. In the case of pawning, default can also occur which requires that the collateral from the debtor be confiscated in the event of default. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal strength of crypto assets used as collateral objects and to find out the execution mechanism for crypto asset confiscation in Indonesia in the event of default. This study used a normative juridical research method for its research. The type of information used in this study is secondary information, specifically information found through library research. The result of this research is that crypto assets can be used as collateral objects, but not as main collateral. Crypto assets as collateral objects already have strong legal force, this is based on Book II of the Civil Code, Law no. 10 of 2011 concerning Amendments to Law Number 32 of 1997 concerning Commodity Futures Trading, Regulation of the Commodity Futures Trading Supervisory Agency Number 5 of 2019 concerning Technical Provisions for the Implementation of the Physical Crypto Asset Market on the Futures Exchange. In terms of regulating the confiscation of crypto assets, it can be said that currently in Indonesia itself there are no special regulations and special institutions that regulate the confiscation of crypto assets. But the process of confiscation of crypto assets can be carried out with procedures such as foreclosure of other material guarantees.
加密货币是一种与真实货币类似的虚拟货币,使用户能够虚拟地为涉及商业的交易发送支付。随着加密资产的发展,一些典当和贷款机构接受加密资产作为抵押品。在典当的情况下,违约也可能发生,这要求在违约的情况下,债务人的抵押品被没收。本研究的目的是确定作为抵押对象的加密资产的法律效力,并找出在违约情况下印度尼西亚加密资产没收的执行机制。本研究采用规范的法学研究方法进行研究。本研究中使用的信息类型是二手信息,特别是通过图书馆研究找到的信息。这项研究的结果是,加密资产可以作为抵押品,但不能作为主要抵押品。作为抵押品的加密资产已经具有很强的法律效力,这是基于民法典第二卷,第2号法律。2011年第10号关于修订1997年第32号商品期货交易法的法令,2019年第5号关于期货交易所实施实物加密资产市场技术规定的商品期货交易监督机构管理条例。在规范加密资产的没收方面,可以说目前印尼本身并没有专门的法规和专门的机构来规范加密资产的没收。但是,没收加密资产的过程可以通过取消其他物质担保的抵押品赎回权等程序进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信