The Elites of Solidarity: Prosopography of Delegates for the First National Congress of Solidarity

Piotr Osęka
{"title":"The Elites of Solidarity: Prosopography of Delegates for the First National Congress of Solidarity","authors":"Piotr Osęka","doi":"10.1177/0888325420941107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims at contributing to the social history of the Solidarity movement by tracing the collective biography of its elected representatives. It will focus on the life trajectories of the 900 delegates to the First National Congress of Delegates. The convention, held in Autumn 1981, is commonly perceived as a focal moment in the history of Solidarity and plays a crucial role in almost every academic narrative on the anti-communist opposition. Often seen as a first genuine Polish parliament since pre-war times, its main task was to forge the political and economic programme thus furthering the revolution. The projected research will draw on genuine methodology, combining prosopographical and oral history approach. The research will address mainly the following issues: what social strata the elites came from, what was their cultural and educational background, what motives/causes/expectations drove them to engage with Solidarity, to what generations did they belong, how did they embrace the character of political transformation of 1989, and to what extent and how did they get involved in the political, economic, and social life of post-communist Poland. In general, the paper seeks to shed a new light on our understanding of Solidarity’s social roots—for instead examining to what extent the contesting, revolutionary elites were a product of the Stalinist social advancement. It also tries to depict the level of continuity between the elites of 1981 and post-1989—thus testing the common theories whether the Third Republic is (or is not) rooted in the legacy of Solidarity.","PeriodicalId":403488,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics & Societies and Cultures","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics & Societies and Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325420941107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article aims at contributing to the social history of the Solidarity movement by tracing the collective biography of its elected representatives. It will focus on the life trajectories of the 900 delegates to the First National Congress of Delegates. The convention, held in Autumn 1981, is commonly perceived as a focal moment in the history of Solidarity and plays a crucial role in almost every academic narrative on the anti-communist opposition. Often seen as a first genuine Polish parliament since pre-war times, its main task was to forge the political and economic programme thus furthering the revolution. The projected research will draw on genuine methodology, combining prosopographical and oral history approach. The research will address mainly the following issues: what social strata the elites came from, what was their cultural and educational background, what motives/causes/expectations drove them to engage with Solidarity, to what generations did they belong, how did they embrace the character of political transformation of 1989, and to what extent and how did they get involved in the political, economic, and social life of post-communist Poland. In general, the paper seeks to shed a new light on our understanding of Solidarity’s social roots—for instead examining to what extent the contesting, revolutionary elites were a product of the Stalinist social advancement. It also tries to depict the level of continuity between the elites of 1981 and post-1989—thus testing the common theories whether the Third Republic is (or is not) rooted in the legacy of Solidarity.
团结的精英:第一次全国团结代表大会代表述评
这篇文章旨在通过追踪团结工会当选代表的集体传记,为团结工会运动的社会史做出贡献。它将重点关注900名第一次全国代表大会代表的生活轨迹。1981年秋举行的大会被普遍认为是团结工会历史上的一个焦点时刻,在几乎所有关于反共反对派的学术叙述中都起着至关重要的作用。它通常被视为自战前以来第一个真正的波兰议会,其主要任务是制定政治和经济计划,从而进一步推动革命。预计的研究将采用真正的方法,结合人文学和口述历史的方法。研究将主要解决以下问题:精英来自什么社会阶层,他们的文化和教育背景是什么,什么动机/原因/期望驱使他们参与团结工会,他们属于哪几代人,他们如何接受1989年政治转型的特征,以及他们在多大程度上以及如何参与后共产主义波兰的政治,经济和社会生活。总的来说,这篇论文试图为我们对团结工会的社会根源的理解提供一个新的视角,而不是研究在多大程度上竞争,革命精英是斯大林主义社会进步的产物。它还试图描绘1981年和1989年后精英之间的连续性水平,从而检验第三共和国是否(或不是)植根于团结工会遗产的共同理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信