Using the Wavelet Packet Transform to evaluate harmonics through a lookup table technique

I. Nicolae, P. Nicolae
{"title":"Using the Wavelet Packet Transform to evaluate harmonics through a lookup table technique","authors":"I. Nicolae, P. Nicolae","doi":"10.1109/ISFEE.2016.7803205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper is concerned with an intuitive approach of harmonics evaluation by using the Wavelet Packet Transform. Conceptual argumentation of simple and reliable algorithms is provided firstly. Two wavelet mothers (WM) were analyzed in order to see which of them allows for a simpler and faster implementation, involving less computer resources simultaneously with improved accuracy. The first one (using a Daubechy WM relying on 28 coefficients - known as db14 in Matlab) involves smaller runtimes for decomposition, but the per/node weights of “node-dominant” harmonics have often smaller values when compared to those yielded by db20. For both analyzed WM, 8 nodes from the final level could be grouped in pairs considering the principle: energies of nodes in a group are affected only by a pair of harmonics and the paired corresponding harmonics do not affect any other node except those from that group. The weights of energies generated by signals polluted by a single harmonic were found to be almost identical for a certain node, irrespective to the magnitude or phase of the analyzed signals. On the other hand, when pairs of harmonics (correlated by the nodes where their energies can be found) act simultaneously, variations of the above mentioned weights were recorded. Therefore a harmonic evaluation based on the solving of 2×2 linear systems yields errors and sometimes negative energies leading to values for harmonic magnitudes out of the real numbers' space. In this context we conceived and implemented another algorithm, based on a lookup table technique. For the “non-paired” harmonics another rule was detected. Groups of 4 nodes (quadruples) are affected only by groups of at most 4 harmonics. Three quadruples were found. For one of them only the energies of 3 nodes a required, because only 3 harmonics influence the nodes from the quadruple. Good mean values of errors related to the harmonic magnitudes evaluation were obtained after running sets of 50 randomly polluted signals for all pairs of odd harmonic orders from the range 3...40. Most of the absolute percent errors higher then 1.5% from the RMS value of the polluted signal in the case when the lookup table technique was used were found to be associated to inversions in paired harmonics (that is the magnitudes of harmonics were computed as being switched between the members in a harmonic pair). This is due to the symmetry of some components of the matrices used for calculation and perhaps can be solved by using more accurate values for them.","PeriodicalId":240170,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Symposium on Fundamentals of Electrical Engineering (ISFEE)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Symposium on Fundamentals of Electrical Engineering (ISFEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISFEE.2016.7803205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The paper is concerned with an intuitive approach of harmonics evaluation by using the Wavelet Packet Transform. Conceptual argumentation of simple and reliable algorithms is provided firstly. Two wavelet mothers (WM) were analyzed in order to see which of them allows for a simpler and faster implementation, involving less computer resources simultaneously with improved accuracy. The first one (using a Daubechy WM relying on 28 coefficients - known as db14 in Matlab) involves smaller runtimes for decomposition, but the per/node weights of “node-dominant” harmonics have often smaller values when compared to those yielded by db20. For both analyzed WM, 8 nodes from the final level could be grouped in pairs considering the principle: energies of nodes in a group are affected only by a pair of harmonics and the paired corresponding harmonics do not affect any other node except those from that group. The weights of energies generated by signals polluted by a single harmonic were found to be almost identical for a certain node, irrespective to the magnitude or phase of the analyzed signals. On the other hand, when pairs of harmonics (correlated by the nodes where their energies can be found) act simultaneously, variations of the above mentioned weights were recorded. Therefore a harmonic evaluation based on the solving of 2×2 linear systems yields errors and sometimes negative energies leading to values for harmonic magnitudes out of the real numbers' space. In this context we conceived and implemented another algorithm, based on a lookup table technique. For the “non-paired” harmonics another rule was detected. Groups of 4 nodes (quadruples) are affected only by groups of at most 4 harmonics. Three quadruples were found. For one of them only the energies of 3 nodes a required, because only 3 harmonics influence the nodes from the quadruple. Good mean values of errors related to the harmonic magnitudes evaluation were obtained after running sets of 50 randomly polluted signals for all pairs of odd harmonic orders from the range 3...40. Most of the absolute percent errors higher then 1.5% from the RMS value of the polluted signal in the case when the lookup table technique was used were found to be associated to inversions in paired harmonics (that is the magnitudes of harmonics were computed as being switched between the members in a harmonic pair). This is due to the symmetry of some components of the matrices used for calculation and perhaps can be solved by using more accurate values for them.
利用小波包变换通过查找表技术来评估谐波
本文研究了一种基于小波包变换的谐波直观估计方法。首先给出了简单可靠算法的概念论证。对两个小波母(WM)进行了分析,以确定哪一个可以更简单、更快地实现,同时使用更少的计算机资源并提高精度。第一种方法(使用依赖于28个系数的Daubechy WM——在Matlab中称为db14)涉及更小的分解运行时间,但是“节点主导”谐波的每个节点权重通常比db20产生的权重更小。对于所分析的两个WM,考虑到一组节点的能量只受一对谐波的影响,并且配对的对应谐波不影响除该组节点外的任何其他节点的原则,最终层的8个节点可以成对分组。被单次谐波污染的信号所产生的能量权重在某一节点上几乎是相同的,与被分析信号的大小或相位无关。另一方面,当谐波对(通过可找到其能量的节点相关联)同时作用时,记录上述权重的变化。因此,基于求解2×2线性系统的谐波评估会产生误差,有时还会导致谐波幅度超出实数空间的负能量。在这种情况下,我们构思并实现了另一种基于查找表技术的算法。对于“非配对”谐波,检测到另一条规则。4个节点组(四组)仅受最多4个谐波组的影响。发现了三个四胞胎。其中一个只需要3个节点的能量,因为只有3个谐波影响四重体的节点。在对3 ~ 40范围内的所有奇次谐波阶对运行50组随机污染信号后,得到了与谐波幅值评价相关的较好的误差均值。在使用查找表技术的情况下,发现大多数绝对百分比误差高于污染信号RMS值的1.5%,与成对谐波中的反转有关(即谐波的幅度在谐波对中的成员之间切换时计算)。这是由于用于计算的矩阵的某些分量的对称性,也许可以通过使用更精确的值来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信