Economic and Industry Determinants of Accounting Method Choice

R. M. Bowen, L. DuCharme, D. Shores
{"title":"Economic and Industry Determinants of Accounting Method Choice","authors":"R. M. Bowen, L. DuCharme, D. Shores","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.182888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study synthesizes and extends the prior literature examining economic motives for manager's accounting method choices. First, we present a framework for organizing the economic factors that potentially influence managers' accounting decisions. We apply our framework to examine inventory and depreciation method choices because they are directly observable and have large sustained effects on earnings. Second, we present descriptive statistics on the distribution of these and combined-method choices for the years 1984, 1990, and 1996. Both firm and industry level data show a preponderance of income-increasing methods in each year as well as a trend toward more income-increasing methods over time. Third, we identify 19 independent variables (largely drawn from the past 20 years of research) to explain the inventory, depreciation, and combined-method choices of over 2,000 firms for the years 1984, 1990 and 1996. Taken together, these variables explain a high percentage of the cross-sectional variation in method choices (e.g., adjusted R2 of 23%-27% for combined-method choices). Finally, we add variables that proxy for industry determinants of accounting method choice, which increases total explanatory power to 28%-37% for combined-method choices. Both sets of variables, economic and industry, have incremental explanatory power over the other. Given earlier studies often explained less than 5%, our results suggest that, cumulatively, the accounting literature has made considerable progress in identifying economic factors associated with managers' accounting method choices.","PeriodicalId":180033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Abstracts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.182888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

This study synthesizes and extends the prior literature examining economic motives for manager's accounting method choices. First, we present a framework for organizing the economic factors that potentially influence managers' accounting decisions. We apply our framework to examine inventory and depreciation method choices because they are directly observable and have large sustained effects on earnings. Second, we present descriptive statistics on the distribution of these and combined-method choices for the years 1984, 1990, and 1996. Both firm and industry level data show a preponderance of income-increasing methods in each year as well as a trend toward more income-increasing methods over time. Third, we identify 19 independent variables (largely drawn from the past 20 years of research) to explain the inventory, depreciation, and combined-method choices of over 2,000 firms for the years 1984, 1990 and 1996. Taken together, these variables explain a high percentage of the cross-sectional variation in method choices (e.g., adjusted R2 of 23%-27% for combined-method choices). Finally, we add variables that proxy for industry determinants of accounting method choice, which increases total explanatory power to 28%-37% for combined-method choices. Both sets of variables, economic and industry, have incremental explanatory power over the other. Given earlier studies often explained less than 5%, our results suggest that, cumulatively, the accounting literature has made considerable progress in identifying economic factors associated with managers' accounting method choices.
会计方法选择的经济和行业决定因素
本研究综合并扩展了先前研究经理人会计方法选择的经济动机的文献。首先,我们提出了一个框架来组织可能影响管理者会计决策的经济因素。我们应用我们的框架来检查库存和折旧方法的选择,因为它们是直接可观察到的,对收益有很大的持续影响。其次,我们对1984年、1990年和1996年的这些和组合方法选择的分布进行了描述性统计。公司和行业层面的数据都显示,每年增加收入的方法都占主导地位,而且随着时间的推移,增加收入的方法也有增加的趋势。第三,我们确定了19个自变量(主要来自过去20年的研究)来解释1984年、1990年和1996年2000多家公司的库存、折旧和综合方法选择。综上所述,这些变量解释了方法选择中很大比例的横截面差异(例如,组合方法选择的调整R2为23%-27%)。最后,我们添加了代表会计方法选择的行业决定因素的变量,这将组合方法选择的总解释力提高到28%-37%。经济和工业这两组变量对另一组的解释力都是递增的。鉴于早期的研究通常解释不到5%,我们的结果表明,累积起来,会计文献在识别与管理者会计方法选择相关的经济因素方面取得了相当大的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信