Professors in Humanities at Vilnius University and the Doctrine in the Period of Activities of Donatas Sauka

Ingė Lukšaitė
{"title":"Professors in Humanities at Vilnius University and the Doctrine in the Period of Activities of Donatas Sauka","authors":"Ingė Lukšaitė","doi":"10.15388/LITERA.2020.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of professors in Humanities at Vilnius University in 1948–1956, the period of studies and post-graduate course of Donatas Sauka, established that professors who had not accepted the doctrine of Marxism-Leninism and who had obtained their academic titles in independent Lithuania or pre-revolutionary Russia had left the university. During the first year of Soviet rule, a group of persons who had contributed to Lithuania’s incorporation into the USSR and undertaken to establish the doctrine at the university became professors. They were active in the 1940s and 1950s and created a climate of fear. Some lecturers who were neutral towards the doctrine had been granted the title of professors for their contribution to the science in order to raise the prestige of the university. A cluster of lecturers who attempted to interpret literature without applying primitive sociologisation was formed in the Department of Lithuanian Literature in mid 1950s. At the initiative of the Central Committee of the Lithuanian Communist Party, actions were taken (1956–1961) to force the group of young lecturers to follow the requirements of the doctrine. Having defied the requirements, they were dismissed. D. Sauka belonged to the group, but had retained his job as a lecturer without changing his views towards the doctrine. Some professors, associate professors, and students at the university participated in the ideological cleansing of the Department of Lithuanian Literature. They were later promoted. During the 1960s, among literary scholars only Jurgis Lebedys became a professor. At that time, high qualification requirements for obtaining a professor’s title were set in the USSR. Those who had obtained the titles of professors had different approaches towards the doctrine of Marxism-Leninism. Some showed support only formally and expanded the scope of analysed issues by slowly validating new fields of knowledge and developed individual thinking; others attained high qualification and performed the actions of implementing the doctrine required by the party leaders; still others sought their personal goals by using maintenance of the doctrine as a pretext. The guardians of the doctrine created obstacles for unwanted persons in becoming professors by trying to prevent them from defending their doctoral (post-doctoral) theses and publishing their articles and works; they tried to create a wall of silence around them. In the 1970s, D. Sauka and Vytautas Kubilius defended their doctoral (post-doctoral) theses; both of them had surpassed the topics defined by the doctrine and opened new fields of knowledge in Lithuanian literature and culture. Attempts were made to prevent them from defending their theses, but thanks to the vigilance of his colleagues, D. Sauka defended his thesis and became a professor after four years. The approval of V. Kubilius’s doctoral (post-doctoral) title lasted six years, yet one of the strongest literary critics and scholars was not granted the title of professor from the Soviet university. In the 1980s, a number of students at Vilnius University obtained titles of professors. The doctrine itself had changed at that time, the communist government avoided scandals, the level of mentality was higher at the university, and simultaneously, the behaviour of lecturers themselves was self-censored; some of the guardians of the doctrine had voluntarily abandoned their position and those who appreciated the works of their talented colleagues appeared. At the juncture of the 1980s and 1990s, professors of Vilnius University became more prominent in the society: these were personalities that developed individual thinking of their own and others, done valuable work for the culture of Lithuania, retained relations with the nation and had the goal of creating an independent state of Lithuania.","PeriodicalId":432201,"journal":{"name":"Literatūra","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literatūra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/LITERA.2020.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analysis of professors in Humanities at Vilnius University in 1948–1956, the period of studies and post-graduate course of Donatas Sauka, established that professors who had not accepted the doctrine of Marxism-Leninism and who had obtained their academic titles in independent Lithuania or pre-revolutionary Russia had left the university. During the first year of Soviet rule, a group of persons who had contributed to Lithuania’s incorporation into the USSR and undertaken to establish the doctrine at the university became professors. They were active in the 1940s and 1950s and created a climate of fear. Some lecturers who were neutral towards the doctrine had been granted the title of professors for their contribution to the science in order to raise the prestige of the university. A cluster of lecturers who attempted to interpret literature without applying primitive sociologisation was formed in the Department of Lithuanian Literature in mid 1950s. At the initiative of the Central Committee of the Lithuanian Communist Party, actions were taken (1956–1961) to force the group of young lecturers to follow the requirements of the doctrine. Having defied the requirements, they were dismissed. D. Sauka belonged to the group, but had retained his job as a lecturer without changing his views towards the doctrine. Some professors, associate professors, and students at the university participated in the ideological cleansing of the Department of Lithuanian Literature. They were later promoted. During the 1960s, among literary scholars only Jurgis Lebedys became a professor. At that time, high qualification requirements for obtaining a professor’s title were set in the USSR. Those who had obtained the titles of professors had different approaches towards the doctrine of Marxism-Leninism. Some showed support only formally and expanded the scope of analysed issues by slowly validating new fields of knowledge and developed individual thinking; others attained high qualification and performed the actions of implementing the doctrine required by the party leaders; still others sought their personal goals by using maintenance of the doctrine as a pretext. The guardians of the doctrine created obstacles for unwanted persons in becoming professors by trying to prevent them from defending their doctoral (post-doctoral) theses and publishing their articles and works; they tried to create a wall of silence around them. In the 1970s, D. Sauka and Vytautas Kubilius defended their doctoral (post-doctoral) theses; both of them had surpassed the topics defined by the doctrine and opened new fields of knowledge in Lithuanian literature and culture. Attempts were made to prevent them from defending their theses, but thanks to the vigilance of his colleagues, D. Sauka defended his thesis and became a professor after four years. The approval of V. Kubilius’s doctoral (post-doctoral) title lasted six years, yet one of the strongest literary critics and scholars was not granted the title of professor from the Soviet university. In the 1980s, a number of students at Vilnius University obtained titles of professors. The doctrine itself had changed at that time, the communist government avoided scandals, the level of mentality was higher at the university, and simultaneously, the behaviour of lecturers themselves was self-censored; some of the guardians of the doctrine had voluntarily abandoned their position and those who appreciated the works of their talented colleagues appeared. At the juncture of the 1980s and 1990s, professors of Vilnius University became more prominent in the society: these were personalities that developed individual thinking of their own and others, done valuable work for the culture of Lithuania, retained relations with the nation and had the goal of creating an independent state of Lithuania.
维尔纽斯大学人文学科教授与多纳塔斯·索卡活动时期的学说
对维尔纽斯大学人文学科教授(1948-1956年,即多纳塔斯·索卡的学习和研究生课程期间)的分析表明,那些不接受马克思列宁主义学说并在独立的立陶宛或革命前的俄罗斯获得学术头衔的教授已离开该大学。在苏联统治的第一年,一群为立陶宛并入苏联作出贡献并在大学确立这一学说的人成为了教授。他们在20世纪40年代和50年代很活跃,制造了一种恐惧的气氛。为了提高大学的声望,一些对学说持中立态度的讲师被授予教授的头衔,以表彰他们对科学的贡献。20世纪50年代中期,立陶宛文学系形成了一批试图不运用原始社会学解释文学的讲师。在立陶宛共产党中央委员会的倡议下(1956年至1961年)采取了行动,迫使这群青年讲师遵守该学说的要求。由于违反了要求,他们被解雇了。索卡属于这个团体,但他保留了讲师的工作,并没有改变他对这个教义的看法。该大学的一些教授、副教授和学生参加了对立陶宛文学系的思想清洗。他们后来都得到了提升。在20世纪60年代,文学学者中只有尤吉斯·勒贝迪斯成为教授。当时,苏联对获得教授头衔的资格要求很高。那些获得教授头衔的人对马克思列宁主义学说的态度各不相同。有些只在形式上表示支持,并通过慢慢证实新的知识领域和发展个人思维来扩大分析问题的范围;另一些人的素质很高,按照党的领导人的要求行事;还有一些人以维护教义为借口来达到他们的个人目的。该学说的捍卫者为不受欢迎的人成为教授设置了障碍,试图阻止他们捍卫自己的博士(博士后)论文并发表他们的文章和著作;他们试图在周围筑起一道沉默之墙。在20世纪70年代,索卡博士和维陶塔斯·库比留斯为他们的博士(博士后)论文辩护;它们都超越了学说所确定的主题,并在立陶宛文学和文化中开辟了新的知识领域。他们试图阻止他们为自己的论文辩护,但由于同事们的警惕,索卡博士在四年后捍卫了自己的论文,并成为了一名教授。库比留斯的博士(博士后)头衔的批准持续了六年,但最强大的文学评论家和学者之一没有被授予苏联大学的教授头衔。在1980年代,维尔纽斯大学的一些学生获得了教授头衔。当时学说本身已经发生了变化,共产党政府避免丑闻,大学里的思想水平更高,同时,讲师本身的行为也受到自我审查;一些教义的捍卫者自愿放弃了他们的立场,那些欣赏他们才华横溢的同事的作品的人出现了。在20世纪80年代和90年代的关键时刻,维尔纽斯大学的教授在社会上变得更加突出:这些人发展了自己和他人的个人思想,为立陶宛文化做出了有价值的工作,保持了与民族的关系,并以创建立陶宛独立国家为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信