Tapping Home Equity: Income and Spending Trends Around Cash-Out Refinances and HELOCs

Diana Farrell, Fiona Greig, Chen Zhao
{"title":"Tapping Home Equity: Income and Spending Trends Around Cash-Out Refinances and HELOCs","authors":"Diana Farrell, Fiona Greig, Chen Zhao","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3742341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximately two thirds of American families own a home and for most homeowners, their house is also their most important source of wealth. Homeowners are currently sitting on historically high levels of home equity and the potential withdrawal of this home equity has important implications for consumption at the macroeconomic and household levels. In this report, we examine the extent to which liquidating home equity boosts consumption, as well as how income dynamics around equity extraction may play a role in influencing households’ decision to draw from this source of wealth. Using loan-level servicing data from Chase mortgage customers combined with corresponding Chase deposit account data from 2012 to 2018, we create a sample of more than 50,000 homeowners who either obtained a cash-out refinance or drew on a home equity line of credit (HELOC). We find that for homeowners who cash-out refinanced, most refinanced into a lower interest rate but a higher monthly payment because of a larger loan balance. Also, after controlling for secular trends, homeowners who obtained a cash-out refinance had no change in income whereas homeowners who extracted equity via a HELOC experienced declining income. For both groups, consumption spiked considerably as soon as the liquidated equity flowed into the bank account but quickly settled to steady state-levels at a higher level, 5 percent and 7 percent above baseline for HELOCs and cash-out refinances, respectively. After one year, cash-out refinance homeowners spent 33 percent of their total equity extracted while those with a HELOC spent 47 percent overall. For both sample groups, these marginal propensities to consume (MPCs) were highest for younger homeowners and those with higher loan-to-values (LTVs). Taken together, these findings have important implications for macroeconomic and housing policies.","PeriodicalId":443703,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Intertemporal Choice & Discounting (Topic)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Intertemporal Choice & Discounting (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3742341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately two thirds of American families own a home and for most homeowners, their house is also their most important source of wealth. Homeowners are currently sitting on historically high levels of home equity and the potential withdrawal of this home equity has important implications for consumption at the macroeconomic and household levels. In this report, we examine the extent to which liquidating home equity boosts consumption, as well as how income dynamics around equity extraction may play a role in influencing households’ decision to draw from this source of wealth. Using loan-level servicing data from Chase mortgage customers combined with corresponding Chase deposit account data from 2012 to 2018, we create a sample of more than 50,000 homeowners who either obtained a cash-out refinance or drew on a home equity line of credit (HELOC). We find that for homeowners who cash-out refinanced, most refinanced into a lower interest rate but a higher monthly payment because of a larger loan balance. Also, after controlling for secular trends, homeowners who obtained a cash-out refinance had no change in income whereas homeowners who extracted equity via a HELOC experienced declining income. For both groups, consumption spiked considerably as soon as the liquidated equity flowed into the bank account but quickly settled to steady state-levels at a higher level, 5 percent and 7 percent above baseline for HELOCs and cash-out refinances, respectively. After one year, cash-out refinance homeowners spent 33 percent of their total equity extracted while those with a HELOC spent 47 percent overall. For both sample groups, these marginal propensities to consume (MPCs) were highest for younger homeowners and those with higher loan-to-values (LTVs). Taken together, these findings have important implications for macroeconomic and housing policies.
利用房屋净值:围绕现金再融资和HELOCs的收入和支出趋势
大约三分之二的美国家庭拥有自己的房子,对大多数房主来说,房子也是他们最重要的财富来源。房主目前正坐拥历史高位的房屋净值,这些房屋净值的潜在撤出对宏观经济和家庭层面的消费具有重要影响。在本报告中,我们研究了清算房屋净值促进消费的程度,以及围绕股权提取的收入动态如何影响家庭从这一财富来源中提取的决定。利用大通银行抵押贷款客户的贷款水平服务数据,结合2012年至2018年相应的大通银行存款账户数据,我们创建了一个由5万多名房主组成的样本,这些房主要么获得了套现再融资,要么利用了房屋净值信贷额度(HELOC)。我们发现,对于套现再融资的房主,大多数再融资的利率较低,但由于贷款余额较大,每月还款额较高。此外,在控制长期趋势后,获得现金赎回再融资的房主收入没有变化,而通过HELOC提取股权的房主收入下降。对于这两组人来说,一旦清算后的股本流入银行账户,消费就会大幅飙升,但很快就稳定在较高水平的稳定水平,HELOCs和现金再融资的消费分别比基准高出5%和7%。一年后,套现再融资的房主花费了他们总股本的33%,而那些有HELOC的房主花费了47%。对于这两个样本组,这些边际消费倾向(MPCs)在年轻房主和贷款价值比(ltv)较高的房主中最高。综上所述,这些发现对宏观经济和住房政策具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信