Are Pharmaceutical Market Withdrawals Preventable? A Preliminary Analysis

Jaya Sai V. Daggumalli, Irwin G. Martin
{"title":"Are Pharmaceutical Market Withdrawals Preventable? A Preliminary Analysis","authors":"Jaya Sai V. Daggumalli, Irwin G. Martin","doi":"10.1177/0092861512458776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some drugs have been removed from the market once it had been determined that their risks outweighed their benefits. Withdrawals negatively impact patients using the drugs as well the pharmaceutical companies who devoted tremendous resources to research, development, and marketing. Therefore, there is a desire to minimize drug withdrawals by learning from previous incidents. Hints of the problems that lead to eventual market withdrawal might be found in the initial New Drug Application (NDA). If inappropriate approvals could be prevented, patients’ safety might be protected and withdrawals would not be necessary. Drugs withdrawn between 2001 and 2010 (n = 15) were considered for this investigation. The primary adverse events that led to the withdrawal of these 15 drugs were compared with the data available in the original NDA medical review. From the 15 drugs considered, sufficient information for analysis was available for only 7 drugs. Among the 7 drugs analyzed, the safety data found for 2 particular drugs suggested potential safety signals. Preliminary analyses suggest that the drug withdrawals could not have been predicted for the majority of drugs removed from the market.","PeriodicalId":391574,"journal":{"name":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","volume":"30-31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512458776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Some drugs have been removed from the market once it had been determined that their risks outweighed their benefits. Withdrawals negatively impact patients using the drugs as well the pharmaceutical companies who devoted tremendous resources to research, development, and marketing. Therefore, there is a desire to minimize drug withdrawals by learning from previous incidents. Hints of the problems that lead to eventual market withdrawal might be found in the initial New Drug Application (NDA). If inappropriate approvals could be prevented, patients’ safety might be protected and withdrawals would not be necessary. Drugs withdrawn between 2001 and 2010 (n = 15) were considered for this investigation. The primary adverse events that led to the withdrawal of these 15 drugs were compared with the data available in the original NDA medical review. From the 15 drugs considered, sufficient information for analysis was available for only 7 drugs. Among the 7 drugs analyzed, the safety data found for 2 particular drugs suggested potential safety signals. Preliminary analyses suggest that the drug withdrawals could not have been predicted for the majority of drugs removed from the market.
药品市场撤回是否可预防?初步分析
一旦确定某些药物的风险大于其益处,它们就会被从市场上撤下。停药对使用药物的患者以及投入大量资源进行研究、开发和营销的制药公司都产生了负面影响。因此,人们希望从以往的事件中吸取教训,尽量减少药物戒断。在最初的新药申请(NDA)中可能会发现导致最终市场撤回的问题的迹象。如果可以防止不适当的批准,患者的安全可能得到保护,并且不需要停药。本次调查考虑了2001年至2010年间撤回的药物(n = 15)。导致这15种药物停药的主要不良事件与原始NDA医学审查中的可用数据进行比较。在考虑的15种药物中,只有7种药物有足够的分析信息。在分析的7种药物中,有2种药物的安全性数据提示了潜在的安全信号。初步分析表明,无法预测从市场上撤下的大多数药物的停药情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信