Intimate Deception Outside of Romantic, Sexual, or Marital Relationships

J. Hasday
{"title":"Intimate Deception Outside of Romantic, Sexual, or Marital Relationships","authors":"J. Hasday","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190905941.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores deceit between family members who are not connected to each other as spouses, sexual partners, or romantic interests. The premise that the law should protect intimate deceivers still appears here, but is almost exclusively confined to cases considering parents who have deceived their children—including their adult children. Judges are often unwilling to penalize deceptive parents and quick to blame children for having been duped. When the parties are reversed, however, courts are frequently eager to grant remedies to parents suing deceitful adult children and willing to empower parents to inflict their own penalties on deceptive children below the age of majority. Moreover, when courts move beyond marital and parental relationships to consider deception by other relatives, they routinely presume that the judiciary should treat these family members—deceitful siblings, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, and the like—as if they were unrelated to the people they deceived.","PeriodicalId":146003,"journal":{"name":"Intimate Lies and the Law","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intimate Lies and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190905941.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores deceit between family members who are not connected to each other as spouses, sexual partners, or romantic interests. The premise that the law should protect intimate deceivers still appears here, but is almost exclusively confined to cases considering parents who have deceived their children—including their adult children. Judges are often unwilling to penalize deceptive parents and quick to blame children for having been duped. When the parties are reversed, however, courts are frequently eager to grant remedies to parents suing deceitful adult children and willing to empower parents to inflict their own penalties on deceptive children below the age of majority. Moreover, when courts move beyond marital and parental relationships to consider deception by other relatives, they routinely presume that the judiciary should treat these family members—deceitful siblings, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, and the like—as if they were unrelated to the people they deceived.
在浪漫、性或婚姻关系之外的亲密欺骗
这一章探讨了家庭成员之间的欺骗,这些家庭成员彼此之间没有配偶、性伴侣或浪漫的兴趣。法律应该保护亲密欺骗者的前提在这里仍然存在,但几乎完全局限于涉及父母欺骗子女(包括他们的成年子女)的案件。法官往往不愿意惩罚欺骗孩子的父母,而是迅速指责孩子被欺骗了。然而,当双方当事人被推翻时,法院往往急于对起诉欺诈的成年子女的父母给予补救,并愿意授权父母对欺诈的未成年子女施加自己的惩罚。此外,当法院超越婚姻和父母关系来考虑其他亲属的欺骗行为时,他们通常认为司法部门应该对待这些家庭成员——欺骗的兄弟姐妹、阿姨、叔叔、侄女、侄子等等——就好像他们与被欺骗的人无关一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信