Users' preferences for telemedical consultations: Comparing users' attitude towards different media in technology-mediated doctor-patient-communication

Shirley Beul-Leusmann, M. Ziefle, E. Jakobs
{"title":"Users' preferences for telemedical consultations: Comparing users' attitude towards different media in technology-mediated doctor-patient-communication","authors":"Shirley Beul-Leusmann, M. Ziefle, E. Jakobs","doi":"10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH.2011.246035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within industrialized countries healthcare systems currently change to cope with the upcoming consequences of the demographic change. One of the most serious challenges is the maintenance of the area-wide supply chain of medical care despite the threatening shortage of physicians. In this context, telemedical services for communication between doctors and patients gain in importance. Crucial for the success of such electronic services is the choice of the medium, which must be appropriate for this special purpose of use and, finally, accepted by its users. In this paper, an exploratory survey was conducted to detect acceptance motives of five different media (face-to-face, telephone, videophone, video conference, interactive wall) in two different usage situations. 103 respondents participated (17-83 years). Findings show that for the standard case, a face-to-face consultation is still highly preferred compared to any telemedical applications. For emergency situations, participants' attitudes change: A telephone consultation was similarly well accepted than face-to-face communication. As the most comfortable service a face-to-face-consultation was corroborated, followed by the videophone consultation.","PeriodicalId":444978,"journal":{"name":"2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops","volume":"180 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH.2011.246035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Within industrialized countries healthcare systems currently change to cope with the upcoming consequences of the demographic change. One of the most serious challenges is the maintenance of the area-wide supply chain of medical care despite the threatening shortage of physicians. In this context, telemedical services for communication between doctors and patients gain in importance. Crucial for the success of such electronic services is the choice of the medium, which must be appropriate for this special purpose of use and, finally, accepted by its users. In this paper, an exploratory survey was conducted to detect acceptance motives of five different media (face-to-face, telephone, videophone, video conference, interactive wall) in two different usage situations. 103 respondents participated (17-83 years). Findings show that for the standard case, a face-to-face consultation is still highly preferred compared to any telemedical applications. For emergency situations, participants' attitudes change: A telephone consultation was similarly well accepted than face-to-face communication. As the most comfortable service a face-to-face-consultation was corroborated, followed by the videophone consultation.
用户对远程医疗会诊的偏好:比较用户在以技术为媒介的医患沟通中对不同媒体的态度
在工业化国家,医疗保健系统目前正在改变,以应对即将到来的人口变化的后果。最严峻的挑战之一是,尽管面临着医生短缺的威胁,但如何维持整个地区的医疗保健供应链。在这种情况下,用于医生和病人之间交流的远程医疗服务变得越来越重要。这种电子服务成功的关键是媒介的选择,媒介必须适合于这种特殊的使用目的,并最终为用户所接受。本文对面对面、电话、可视电话、视频会议、互动墙五种不同媒体在两种不同使用情境下的接受动机进行了探索性调查。103名调查对象(17-83岁)。研究结果表明,与任何远程医疗应用相比,对于标准病例,面对面咨询仍然是高度首选。对于紧急情况,参与者的态度发生了变化:电话咨询同样比面对面交流更受欢迎。最舒适的服务是面对面咨询,其次是视频电话咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信