The problem of “hellenisation of christianity” in the german theology and russian religious thought of the late 19th — early 20th centuries: prince S. N. Trubetskoy and A. von Harnak
{"title":"The problem of “hellenisation of christianity” in the german theology and russian religious thought of the late 19th — early 20th centuries: prince S. N. Trubetskoy and A. von Harnak","authors":"Konstantin M. Antonov","doi":"10.15382/sturi2022100.88-113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article compares the philosophical-theological and historical-religious ideas and concepts of Prince S. N. Trubetskoi, a religious philosopher of the circle of V. S. Solovyov, a historian of philosophy and religion, and A. von Harnack, the largest representative of Protestant liberal theology of the second half of the 19th and early 20th centuries, famous for his concept of the \"Hellenization of Christianity\". The first part of the article establishes the basis for comparing the ideas of the two authors, identifies their starting points and preconditions, and discusses their place in the history of Christian thought in the context of the idea of religious crisis and the dialectic of confessionalization and deconfessionalization. Further, on the basis of recently published \"Philosophical Correspondence\" of the Trubetskoy brothers, the question of personal acquaintance of the thinkers and its role in the reception of Harnack's ideas in Russian thought is discussed. In the third part, the author reveals the elements of the positive reception of Harnack's ideas by Trubetskoi - on the basis of the data of the same Correspondence and the article \"Ethics and dogmatics\". The article points to Trubetskoy's perception of Harnack's critique of Orthodoxy, compares their understanding of the significance of historical research for philosophical and theological work, and their interpretation of the religious ideal of the kingdom of God.Part 4 outlines the main points of Trubetskoi's polemic with the German thinker - on the basis of the data from Correspondence, his article \"Ethics and Dogmatics\", and the major historical theological work of the philosopher, \"Doctrine of the Logos in its History\". The focus is on questions of Old Church Christology and the problem of the \"Hellenization of Christianity,\" an argument related to the notion of the Jewish origin of Gnosticism. The author emphasizes the significant role of V. Solov'ev's personality and ideas in shaping Trubetskoi's attitude toward Harnack. In conclusion, general conclusions are made about the relationship between Trubetskoi's and Harnack's ideas and about the role of the reception of the German theologian's ideas in the formation of Trubetskoi's own position and the history of Russian religious thought as a whole.","PeriodicalId":170812,"journal":{"name":"St.Tikhons' University Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St.Tikhons' University Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturi2022100.88-113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article compares the philosophical-theological and historical-religious ideas and concepts of Prince S. N. Trubetskoi, a religious philosopher of the circle of V. S. Solovyov, a historian of philosophy and religion, and A. von Harnack, the largest representative of Protestant liberal theology of the second half of the 19th and early 20th centuries, famous for his concept of the "Hellenization of Christianity". The first part of the article establishes the basis for comparing the ideas of the two authors, identifies their starting points and preconditions, and discusses their place in the history of Christian thought in the context of the idea of religious crisis and the dialectic of confessionalization and deconfessionalization. Further, on the basis of recently published "Philosophical Correspondence" of the Trubetskoy brothers, the question of personal acquaintance of the thinkers and its role in the reception of Harnack's ideas in Russian thought is discussed. In the third part, the author reveals the elements of the positive reception of Harnack's ideas by Trubetskoi - on the basis of the data of the same Correspondence and the article "Ethics and dogmatics". The article points to Trubetskoy's perception of Harnack's critique of Orthodoxy, compares their understanding of the significance of historical research for philosophical and theological work, and their interpretation of the religious ideal of the kingdom of God.Part 4 outlines the main points of Trubetskoi's polemic with the German thinker - on the basis of the data from Correspondence, his article "Ethics and Dogmatics", and the major historical theological work of the philosopher, "Doctrine of the Logos in its History". The focus is on questions of Old Church Christology and the problem of the "Hellenization of Christianity," an argument related to the notion of the Jewish origin of Gnosticism. The author emphasizes the significant role of V. Solov'ev's personality and ideas in shaping Trubetskoi's attitude toward Harnack. In conclusion, general conclusions are made about the relationship between Trubetskoi's and Harnack's ideas and about the role of the reception of the German theologian's ideas in the formation of Trubetskoi's own position and the history of Russian religious thought as a whole.
本文比较了哲学宗教史家索洛维约夫(V. S. Solovyov)圈子里的宗教哲学家S. N. Trubetskoi王子和19世纪下半叶和20世纪初以“基督教希腊化”概念而闻名的新教自由主义神学的最大代表a . von Harnack的哲学神学和历史宗教思想和概念。文章的第一部分为比较两位作者的思想奠定了基础,确定了他们的出发点和前提,并在宗教危机观念和告解与去告解的辩证法的背景下讨论了他们在基督教思想史上的地位。此外,在最近出版的特鲁别茨科伊兄弟的《哲学通信》的基础上,讨论了两位思想家的个人认识问题及其在俄罗斯思想界接受哈纳克思想中的作用。第三部分,笔者以《通信》和《伦理学与教条学》一文为基础,揭示了特鲁别茨科伊积极接受哈纳克思想的因素。文章指出了特鲁别茨科伊对哈纳克对东正教的批判的看法,比较了他们对历史研究对哲学和神学工作的意义的理解,以及他们对神国宗教理想的解释。第四部分概述了特鲁别茨科伊与这位德国思想家争论的要点——基于《通信》的数据,他的文章《伦理学和教条学》,以及这位哲学家的主要历史神学著作《历史上的逻各斯学说》。重点是关于旧教会基督论的问题和“基督教的希腊化”的问题,这是一个与诺斯替主义的犹太起源有关的论点。作者强调了索洛夫耶夫的个性和思想在塑造特鲁别茨科伊对哈纳克的态度中所起的重要作用。最后,对特鲁别茨科伊和哈纳克思想之间的关系,以及对德国神学家思想的接受在特鲁别茨科伊自身立场的形成和整个俄罗斯宗教思想史中的作用做出了一般性的结论。