An alternative evaluation of post traumatic stress disorder with machine learning methods

S. İ. Omurca, Ekin Ekinci
{"title":"An alternative evaluation of post traumatic stress disorder with machine learning methods","authors":"S. İ. Omurca, Ekin Ekinci","doi":"10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the world we live in, people from different professions are at increased risk for depressive symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to hard working or extreme environmental conditions. Accurate diagnosis and determining the causes are very important to solve these kinds of psychological problems. Machine learning (ML) techniques are gaining popularity in neuroscience due to their high diagnostic capability and effective classification ability. In this paper, alternative hybrid systems which allowed us to develop automatic classifiers for finding the Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients are proposed and compared. With the proposed system, not only the PTSD individuals are classified by ML techniques such as sequential minimal optimization (SMO), multilayer perceptron (MLP), Naïve Bayes (NB) but also the important indications of patients' trauma are determined by three popular feature selection methods such as chi-square, principal component analysis (PCA) and correlation based-feature selection (CFS). The effectiveness of the proposed system is examined on a real world dataset. Due to obtained results we can estimate the individuals as PTSD or NONPTSD patients with 74-79% accuracy range, further to that instead of 39 features 7 features are remarked as the most critical symptoms for PTSD.","PeriodicalId":136707,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)","volume":"191 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

In the world we live in, people from different professions are at increased risk for depressive symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to hard working or extreme environmental conditions. Accurate diagnosis and determining the causes are very important to solve these kinds of psychological problems. Machine learning (ML) techniques are gaining popularity in neuroscience due to their high diagnostic capability and effective classification ability. In this paper, alternative hybrid systems which allowed us to develop automatic classifiers for finding the Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients are proposed and compared. With the proposed system, not only the PTSD individuals are classified by ML techniques such as sequential minimal optimization (SMO), multilayer perceptron (MLP), Naïve Bayes (NB) but also the important indications of patients' trauma are determined by three popular feature selection methods such as chi-square, principal component analysis (PCA) and correlation based-feature selection (CFS). The effectiveness of the proposed system is examined on a real world dataset. Due to obtained results we can estimate the individuals as PTSD or NONPTSD patients with 74-79% accuracy range, further to that instead of 39 features 7 features are remarked as the most critical symptoms for PTSD.
用机器学习方法评估创伤后应激障碍的另一种方法
在我们生活的世界里,不同职业的人由于工作辛苦或极端的环境条件,患抑郁症状和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的风险越来越高。准确诊断和确定病因对解决这类心理问题非常重要。机器学习(ML)技术由于其高诊断能力和有效分类能力在神经科学领域越来越受欢迎。在本文中,我们提出并比较了几种可供选择的混合系统,这些系统允许我们开发用于发现创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者的自动分类器。该系统不仅利用序列最小优化(SMO)、多层感知器(MLP)、Naïve贝叶斯(NB)等机器学习技术对创伤后应激障碍个体进行分类,而且利用卡方、主成分分析(PCA)和基于相关性的特征选择(CFS)等三种常用的特征选择方法确定创伤患者的重要适应症。在一个真实世界的数据集上检验了所提出系统的有效性。根据所获得的结果,我们可以估计个体为PTSD或non - PTSD患者,准确率在74-79%之间,并且认为PTSD最关键的症状特征不是39个,而是7个。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信