Usability Based Rating Scale for Mobile Health Applications

Irum Feroz, Nadeem Ahmad, M. W. Iqbal
{"title":"Usability Based Rating Scale for Mobile Health Applications","authors":"Irum Feroz, Nadeem Ahmad, M. W. Iqbal","doi":"10.1109/ceet1.2019.8711845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a usability study that aims to develop a reliable, multipurpose, comprehensive scale for classification and rating the quality of m_health applications. The rating scale will be primarily based on the ISO standards of Usability (ISO: 9241–11) based on Effectiveness, Efficiency and Satisfaction and another ISO Standard (9126–1) composed of Functionality, Reliability, Usability, Efficiency, Maintainability and Portability. At the present time, there is no quality assessment tool for mobile application rating based on usability beyond Star_Ratings. This scale will initially be used for analysis of different m_health applications and will be helpful for researchers. Our methodology is based on four steps. In first step, we selected 9 most famous m_Health applications which have maximum number of downloads which were evaluated by involving 45 end users. In 2nd step the existing work on rating scale is explored which is found very limited. In 3rd step, we defined taxonomy of usability parameters, distributed them in major and minor classes and the questionnaire for rating m_health applications was also designed. In 4th step, for evaluation of new Rating scale, another group of 45 users were selected. After evaluation of 9 m_health applications, it is finally found that newly developed rating scale is compatible with user effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction. The 5 star rating scale cannot point out which features of applications require enhancement or need improvements. The newly developed scale rightly highlights the weakness of an application in five different categories. The details questionnaire not only shows satisfaction level on individual parameters but also highlight the aspects which need attention.","PeriodicalId":207523,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICEET)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICEET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ceet1.2019.8711845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper presents a usability study that aims to develop a reliable, multipurpose, comprehensive scale for classification and rating the quality of m_health applications. The rating scale will be primarily based on the ISO standards of Usability (ISO: 9241–11) based on Effectiveness, Efficiency and Satisfaction and another ISO Standard (9126–1) composed of Functionality, Reliability, Usability, Efficiency, Maintainability and Portability. At the present time, there is no quality assessment tool for mobile application rating based on usability beyond Star_Ratings. This scale will initially be used for analysis of different m_health applications and will be helpful for researchers. Our methodology is based on four steps. In first step, we selected 9 most famous m_Health applications which have maximum number of downloads which were evaluated by involving 45 end users. In 2nd step the existing work on rating scale is explored which is found very limited. In 3rd step, we defined taxonomy of usability parameters, distributed them in major and minor classes and the questionnaire for rating m_health applications was also designed. In 4th step, for evaluation of new Rating scale, another group of 45 users were selected. After evaluation of 9 m_health applications, it is finally found that newly developed rating scale is compatible with user effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction. The 5 star rating scale cannot point out which features of applications require enhancement or need improvements. The newly developed scale rightly highlights the weakness of an application in five different categories. The details questionnaire not only shows satisfaction level on individual parameters but also highlight the aspects which need attention.
基于可用性的移动健康应用评定量表
本文提出了一项可用性研究,旨在开发一种可靠、多用途、综合的m_health应用质量分类和评级量表。评分标准将主要基于基于有效性、效率和满意度的ISO可用性标准(ISO: 9241-11)和另一个由功能、可靠性、可用性、效率、可维护性和可移植性组成的ISO标准(9126-1)。目前,除了Star_Ratings之外,还没有基于可用性的手机应用质量评估工具。该量表最初将用于分析不同的m_health应用,并将对研究人员有所帮助。我们的方法基于四个步骤。在第一步中,我们选择了9个最有名的、下载量最大的m_Health应用程序,并对45个最终用户进行了评估。第二步,对现有评定量表的研究工作进行了探讨,发现其不足之处。第三步,我们定义了可用性参数的分类,并将其分为主要类和次要类,并设计了m_health应用程序评分问卷。第四步,选择另一组45名用户对新的评分量表进行评估。通过对9个m_health应用程序的评价,最终发现新开发的评分量表与用户有效性、效率和满意度相适应。5星评级量表无法指出应用程序的哪些功能需要增强或需要改进。新开发的量表正确地突出了应用程序在五个不同类别中的弱点。详细问卷不仅显示了个体参数的满意程度,而且突出了需要注意的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信