Coupling gestures with tactile feedback: a comparative user study

G. Lefebvre, Emmanuelle Boyer, Sophie Zijp-Rouzier
{"title":"Coupling gestures with tactile feedback: a comparative user study","authors":"G. Lefebvre, Emmanuelle Boyer, Sophie Zijp-Rouzier","doi":"10.1145/2399016.2399075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper sheds some new light on an experimental evaluation in the field of tactile feedback generation on Smartphone. Tactile feedback on current mobile devices is actually limited therefore we explore using dynamic tactile feedback to improve gesture provision. The main objective is to better understand issues related to touch interactions coupled with tactile feedback. We investigate three dynamic models based on gesture properties in a formal experiment with 24 participants. A fourth uniform feedback model is used as a decoy model. We use a model based on the tension of a spring, a model based on the torque force of a knob and a model based on the gesture curvature. The results evaluate the advantages and drawbacks of each tactile feedback model in an initial reproduction task of reference shapes. The experiment shows dynamic feedback models have some effects on the complexity and the type of gesture. Coupling tactile feedback during user interactions offers good guidance and even more when the tactile model uses the kinetic properties of the user gestures. The subjective evaluations show that the preferred tactile feedback model by the user is the tension of a spring. This pilot evaluation may serve as a reference for future researches in touch based interfaces.","PeriodicalId":352513,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"387 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper sheds some new light on an experimental evaluation in the field of tactile feedback generation on Smartphone. Tactile feedback on current mobile devices is actually limited therefore we explore using dynamic tactile feedback to improve gesture provision. The main objective is to better understand issues related to touch interactions coupled with tactile feedback. We investigate three dynamic models based on gesture properties in a formal experiment with 24 participants. A fourth uniform feedback model is used as a decoy model. We use a model based on the tension of a spring, a model based on the torque force of a knob and a model based on the gesture curvature. The results evaluate the advantages and drawbacks of each tactile feedback model in an initial reproduction task of reference shapes. The experiment shows dynamic feedback models have some effects on the complexity and the type of gesture. Coupling tactile feedback during user interactions offers good guidance and even more when the tactile model uses the kinetic properties of the user gestures. The subjective evaluations show that the preferred tactile feedback model by the user is the tension of a spring. This pilot evaluation may serve as a reference for future researches in touch based interfaces.
结合手势与触觉反馈:一项比较用户研究
本文对智能手机触觉反馈生成领域的实验评估提供了一些新的思路。当前移动设备上的触觉反馈实际上是有限的,因此我们探索使用动态触觉反馈来改善手势提供。主要目标是更好地理解与触觉交互和触觉反馈相关的问题。在一个有24名参与者的正式实验中,我们研究了三种基于手势属性的动态模型。第四种均匀反馈模型被用作诱饵模型。我们使用了一个基于弹簧张力的模型,一个基于旋钮扭矩的模型和一个基于手势曲率的模型。结果评估了每个触觉反馈模型在初始复制参考形状任务中的优点和缺点。实验表明,动态反馈模型对手势的复杂性和类型有一定的影响。在用户交互过程中,耦合触觉反馈提供了良好的指导,当触觉模型使用用户手势的动力学特性时,甚至更多。主观评价表明,用户首选的触觉反馈模型是弹簧的张力。该初步评估可为今后基于触摸的界面研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信