Non Linear and Multi Fractional Tuning Method for Autonomous Vehicles

A. Jerwinprabu, Ashish Tuptee
{"title":"Non Linear and Multi Fractional Tuning Method for Autonomous Vehicles","authors":"A. Jerwinprabu, Ashish Tuptee","doi":"10.15226/2473-3032/4/1/00138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mathematical model of mover is determined using a NewtonEuler formulation. This paper deals with the simulation depend on proposed controller of an industrial mover that can overcome this trouble. It is important to notice that these control loop parameters error cannot be eliminated from the interaction system completely. Within these possibilities, the control system’s performance and the robustness must be considered as important. The aim is to provide industrial oriented solutions and improve the behavior of a differential control system, with an Auto tuning Proportional-Integral-Derivative (ATPID) controller structure. Fractional Order Proportional Integral Derivative controller tuned by genetic algorithm, it is investigated to control and stabilize the position and attitude of control system using feedback linearization. This controller is used as a reference to compare its results with Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller tuned by gain margin. The control structure performance is evaluated through the response and minimizing the error of the position and attitude. Simulation results, demonstrates that position and attitude control using auto PID has fast response, better steady state error and measurement error than PID. By simulation the two controllers are tested under the same conditions using Simulink under Matlab programming.","PeriodicalId":275207,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Robotics and Automation","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Robotics and Automation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15226/2473-3032/4/1/00138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mathematical model of mover is determined using a NewtonEuler formulation. This paper deals with the simulation depend on proposed controller of an industrial mover that can overcome this trouble. It is important to notice that these control loop parameters error cannot be eliminated from the interaction system completely. Within these possibilities, the control system’s performance and the robustness must be considered as important. The aim is to provide industrial oriented solutions and improve the behavior of a differential control system, with an Auto tuning Proportional-Integral-Derivative (ATPID) controller structure. Fractional Order Proportional Integral Derivative controller tuned by genetic algorithm, it is investigated to control and stabilize the position and attitude of control system using feedback linearization. This controller is used as a reference to compare its results with Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller tuned by gain margin. The control structure performance is evaluated through the response and minimizing the error of the position and attitude. Simulation results, demonstrates that position and attitude control using auto PID has fast response, better steady state error and measurement error than PID. By simulation the two controllers are tested under the same conditions using Simulink under Matlab programming.
自动驾驶汽车非线性多分数阶整定方法
采用牛顿-欧拉公式确定了电机的数学模型。本文研究了基于所提出的工业电机控制器的仿真,克服了这一问题。需要注意的是,这些控制回路参数误差不能从交互系统中完全消除。在这些可能性范围内,必须考虑控制系统的性能和鲁棒性。其目的是提供面向工业的解决方案,并改善微分控制系统的行为,采用自动调谐比例-积分-导数(ATPID)控制器结构。研究了采用遗传算法整定的分数阶比例积分导数控制器,利用反馈线性化对控制系统的位置和姿态进行控制和稳定。该控制器作为参考,将其结果与增益裕度调节的比例积分导数(PID)控制器进行比较。通过响应和最小化位置姿态误差来评价控制结构的性能。仿真结果表明,采用自PID控制的位置姿态响应速度快,稳态误差和测量误差均优于PID控制。通过仿真,在Matlab编程下使用Simulink对两种控制器在相同条件下进行了测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信