A Discover of Class and Image Level Variance Between Different Pruning Methods on Convolutional Neural Networks

Shihong Gao
{"title":"A Discover of Class and Image Level Variance Between Different Pruning Methods on Convolutional Neural Networks","authors":"Shihong Gao","doi":"10.1109/SmartIoT49966.2020.00034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neural network pruning techniques have been widely used due to their little deterioration to test set accuracy while removing a great amount of weights in a network. Recent research [1] has shown that pruning impacts classification of classes and images differently even in one task. In this paper, we dive more along this line and find that different kinds of pruning methods will have different influences on classes and images, but pruning methods belonging to the same family will have a similar influence. Specifically, using iterative L1 unstructured pruning gets the least deviation for classes' accuracy from the overall accuracy and structured pruning is more likely to lead to high deviation. These findings show that choice of pruning methods can be quite nuanced and should be treated cautiously before it is used in sensitive domains.","PeriodicalId":399187,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Smart Internet of Things (SmartIoT)","volume":"246 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Smart Internet of Things (SmartIoT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartIoT49966.2020.00034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Neural network pruning techniques have been widely used due to their little deterioration to test set accuracy while removing a great amount of weights in a network. Recent research [1] has shown that pruning impacts classification of classes and images differently even in one task. In this paper, we dive more along this line and find that different kinds of pruning methods will have different influences on classes and images, but pruning methods belonging to the same family will have a similar influence. Specifically, using iterative L1 unstructured pruning gets the least deviation for classes' accuracy from the overall accuracy and structured pruning is more likely to lead to high deviation. These findings show that choice of pruning methods can be quite nuanced and should be treated cautiously before it is used in sensitive domains.
卷积神经网络不同剪枝方法的类和图像级方差研究
神经网络修剪技术由于其在去除网络中大量权值的同时对测试集精度的影响很小而得到了广泛的应用。最近的研究[1]表明,即使在同一个任务中,剪枝对类别和图像分类的影响也是不同的。在本文中,我们沿着这条线深入研究,发现不同的修剪方法对类和图像的影响是不同的,但属于同一科的修剪方法对类和图像的影响是相似的。具体而言,使用迭代L1非结构化剪枝可以使类的精度与总体精度偏差最小,而结构化剪枝更容易导致高偏差。这些发现表明,修剪方法的选择可能非常微妙,在敏感领域使用之前应该谨慎对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信