A Preliminary Study Using Academagogy to Uncover the Problems That Block Adult Online Learner Engagement

Kranthi Addanki, Jason Holdsworth, Dianna Hardy, Trina S. Myers
{"title":"A Preliminary Study Using Academagogy to Uncover the Problems That Block Adult Online Learner Engagement","authors":"Kranthi Addanki, Jason Holdsworth, Dianna Hardy, Trina S. Myers","doi":"10.1145/3511861.3511872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Personalisation plays a vital role in the engagement of adult learners in online learning environments. Historically, research has focused on applying adaptive technologies, including Artificial Intelligence, without integrating those technologies within teaching and learning approaches. Academagogy is a teaching and learning approach that allows an educator to select appropriate parts from the models pedagogy (educator-centred), andragogy (learner-centred), and heutagogy (learner-driven) for better learning outcomes. Previous studies used academagogy in face-to-face learning contexts; however, academagogy's application has been limited in online learning contexts. This paper presents our interim observations of applying academagogy to an online Information Technology course. Using mixed methods to analyse learner self-reflections, online learning analytics, learner grades, learner surveys, and learner interviews, we observed that learners progressed along the PAH continuum towards andragogy and heutagogy, with some exceptions. The exceptions were found where learners regressed on the PAH continuum when they encountered problems. The exceptions provide insights into the problem areas that block learner engagement and achievement, laying a foundation for future work in personalising the online learning experience.","PeriodicalId":175694,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3511861.3511872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Personalisation plays a vital role in the engagement of adult learners in online learning environments. Historically, research has focused on applying adaptive technologies, including Artificial Intelligence, without integrating those technologies within teaching and learning approaches. Academagogy is a teaching and learning approach that allows an educator to select appropriate parts from the models pedagogy (educator-centred), andragogy (learner-centred), and heutagogy (learner-driven) for better learning outcomes. Previous studies used academagogy in face-to-face learning contexts; however, academagogy's application has been limited in online learning contexts. This paper presents our interim observations of applying academagogy to an online Information Technology course. Using mixed methods to analyse learner self-reflections, online learning analytics, learner grades, learner surveys, and learner interviews, we observed that learners progressed along the PAH continuum towards andragogy and heutagogy, with some exceptions. The exceptions were found where learners regressed on the PAH continuum when they encountered problems. The exceptions provide insights into the problem areas that block learner engagement and achievement, laying a foundation for future work in personalising the online learning experience.
一项利用学院学揭示阻碍成人在线学习者参与的问题的初步研究
个性化在成人学习者参与在线学习环境中起着至关重要的作用。从历史上看,研究主要集中在应用自适应技术,包括人工智能,而没有将这些技术整合到教学方法中。学院学是一种教学方法,它允许教育者从教育学(以教育者为中心)、教育学(以学习者为中心)和教育学(以学习者为中心)模式中选择适当的部分,以获得更好的学习效果。以前的研究在面对面的学习环境中使用学术;然而,学术在网络学习环境中的应用受到了限制。本文介绍了我们在网络信息技术课程中应用学术的中期观察。使用混合方法分析学习者自我反思、在线学习分析、学习者评分、学习者调查和学习者访谈,我们观察到学习者沿着PAH连续体向性学和性学发展,有一些例外。当学习者遇到问题时,他们会在PAH连续体上回归。例外情况提供了对阻碍学习者参与和成就的问题领域的见解,为未来个性化在线学习体验的工作奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信