Validity and Reliability of the Solidarity in Pandemics Scale

Müge ULUMAN MERT, Derya Eryi̇ği̇t, E. Tunç, S. Parlak
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Solidarity in Pandemics Scale","authors":"Müge ULUMAN MERT, Derya Eryi̇ği̇t, E. Tunç, S. Parlak","doi":"10.52380/IJPES.2021.8.3.533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study developed a measure of solidarity levels during pandemics, the Solidarity in Pandemics Scale (SPS). This was achieved using a study group of 842 individuals aged between 18 and 65 from different segments of society who had experienced the COVID-19 pandemic and differed in age, gender, and socioeconomic status. Exploratory factor analysis was used to establish the construct validity of the scale, producing a 15-item scale with a one-dimensional structure that explained 34.36% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis using a different study group revealed that all items have significant t-values, and the model established according to model fit indexes has meaningful and acceptable fit values. The internal consistency of the scale results was calculated using the Cronbach Alpha coefficient, and a reliability of .85 in terms of internal consistency was obtained. Test-retest reliability results as another indicator of reliability were found to be .85. Scores on the Altruism Scale were compared with those on the SPS to evaluate the scale’s criterion validity, and a significant relationship was found between the two scale scores. This analysis indicates that the Solidarity in Pandemics Scale is a valid and reliable psychometric tool.","PeriodicalId":422841,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology and Education Studies","volume":"194 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology and Education Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52380/IJPES.2021.8.3.533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study developed a measure of solidarity levels during pandemics, the Solidarity in Pandemics Scale (SPS). This was achieved using a study group of 842 individuals aged between 18 and 65 from different segments of society who had experienced the COVID-19 pandemic and differed in age, gender, and socioeconomic status. Exploratory factor analysis was used to establish the construct validity of the scale, producing a 15-item scale with a one-dimensional structure that explained 34.36% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis using a different study group revealed that all items have significant t-values, and the model established according to model fit indexes has meaningful and acceptable fit values. The internal consistency of the scale results was calculated using the Cronbach Alpha coefficient, and a reliability of .85 in terms of internal consistency was obtained. Test-retest reliability results as another indicator of reliability were found to be .85. Scores on the Altruism Scale were compared with those on the SPS to evaluate the scale’s criterion validity, and a significant relationship was found between the two scale scores. This analysis indicates that the Solidarity in Pandemics Scale is a valid and reliable psychometric tool.
大流行团结量表的有效性和可靠性
这项研究开发了一种流行病期间团结水平的衡量标准,即流行病团结量表(SPS)。这是通过一个由842名年龄在18至65岁之间的人组成的研究组实现的,这些人来自不同的社会阶层,经历过COVID-19大流行,年龄、性别和社会经济地位不同。采用探索性因子分析建立量表的构效度,编制了15项的一维结构量表,解释了34.36%的方差。采用不同研究组进行验证性因子分析,各项目的t值均显著,根据模型拟合指标建立的模型具有有意义且可接受的拟合值。采用Cronbach Alpha系数计算量表结果的内部一致性,内部一致性的信度为0.85。作为信度的另一个指标,重测信度结果为0.85。将利他主义量表得分与SPS得分进行比较,以评估量表的标准效度,发现两量表得分之间存在显著关系。这一分析表明,团结在流行病量表是一个有效和可靠的心理测量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信