Türkçe Eğitimi Öğretim Elemanlarının Teknoloji Yeterliliklerine Yönelik Görüşleri

O. Yorganci
{"title":"Türkçe Eğitimi Öğretim Elemanlarının Teknoloji Yeterliliklerine Yönelik Görüşleri","authors":"O. Yorganci","doi":"10.16916/aded.1050519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to determine the views of Turkish education lecturers on technology competencies. The opinions of the lecturers were gotten on Google Forms through \"Teacher Trainers Technology Competencies Questionnaire\" created by the researcher. The questionnaire consists of two separate parts which are personal information and questions. The study was carried out via a survey design which is one of the quantitative research methods. The study data was collected from the opinions of 88 Turkish education instructors from 38 different universities. The data was analyzed by using the descriptive analysis technique. The answers “yes”, “no” and “partially”, which mean the presence, absence or partial presence of qualifications, were presented and evaluated with frequencies and percentages by converting them into numerical expressions. It has been found out that Turkish education lecturers thought that they were partly sufficient in the items “5.1. I design instruction using technology to meet the needs of different students.”, “6.2. I become a model for teacher candidates by using various technological evaluation applications.”, “8.1. I become a model for teacher candidates to * Öğr. Gör. Dr., Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Rektörlük, TÖMER, İstanbul, yorganci@yildiz.edu.tr, OCRİD: ocrid.org/0000-0001-8230-219X Osman Kürşat YORGANCI 178 communicate with other cultures and regions and establish global connections by using technology.”, “10.2. I participate in continuous professional development and communication activities that support my technology knowledge and skills.”, “11.2. I interact with professional organizations that advocate the use of technology in education.” and “11.3. I influence the thoughts and decisions of teacher candidates regarding technology integration.”; and insufficient in the items “8.2. I design instructional content in which prospective teachers can collaborate with students from different cultures and experiences using technology.” and “8.3. I discuss strategies that prospective teachers may need for regions and cultures with different levels of technological connectivity.” and sufficient in the other items of the questionnaire which consists of 12 main and 41 sub-items and thus different suggestions were proposed based on the obtained results.","PeriodicalId":302679,"journal":{"name":"Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.1050519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the views of Turkish education lecturers on technology competencies. The opinions of the lecturers were gotten on Google Forms through "Teacher Trainers Technology Competencies Questionnaire" created by the researcher. The questionnaire consists of two separate parts which are personal information and questions. The study was carried out via a survey design which is one of the quantitative research methods. The study data was collected from the opinions of 88 Turkish education instructors from 38 different universities. The data was analyzed by using the descriptive analysis technique. The answers “yes”, “no” and “partially”, which mean the presence, absence or partial presence of qualifications, were presented and evaluated with frequencies and percentages by converting them into numerical expressions. It has been found out that Turkish education lecturers thought that they were partly sufficient in the items “5.1. I design instruction using technology to meet the needs of different students.”, “6.2. I become a model for teacher candidates by using various technological evaluation applications.”, “8.1. I become a model for teacher candidates to * Öğr. Gör. Dr., Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Rektörlük, TÖMER, İstanbul, yorganci@yildiz.edu.tr, OCRİD: ocrid.org/0000-0001-8230-219X Osman Kürşat YORGANCI 178 communicate with other cultures and regions and establish global connections by using technology.”, “10.2. I participate in continuous professional development and communication activities that support my technology knowledge and skills.”, “11.2. I interact with professional organizations that advocate the use of technology in education.” and “11.3. I influence the thoughts and decisions of teacher candidates regarding technology integration.”; and insufficient in the items “8.2. I design instructional content in which prospective teachers can collaborate with students from different cultures and experiences using technology.” and “8.3. I discuss strategies that prospective teachers may need for regions and cultures with different levels of technological connectivity.” and sufficient in the other items of the questionnaire which consists of 12 main and 41 sub-items and thus different suggestions were proposed based on the obtained results.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信