Modern Psychometric Analysis of the Muscle Strengthening Activity Scale (MSAS) Using Item Response Theory

P. Hart
{"title":"Modern Psychometric Analysis of the Muscle Strengthening Activity Scale (MSAS) Using Item Response Theory","authors":"P. Hart","doi":"10.12691/rpbs-7-1-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: With the growing need to promote muscle strengthening activity (MSA) for improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL) comes the growing need for proper measurement of MSA behavior. The purpose of this study was to examine test and item functioning of the MSA scale (MSAS) using item response theory (IRT). Methods: The current research fit data from a sample of N = 400 respondents to two different graded response models (GRMs), a three-item muscular strength scale and a three-item muscular endurance scale. For each GRM, model-data fit was examined and IRT assumptions assessed. Results: An unconstrained GRM was found to fit the data better than the constrained model (Δ G2Strength = 10.3, p = .006, RMSEA = .043 & Δ G2Endurance = 7.0, p = .031, RMSEA = .021). GRM boundary location parameters covered the latent trait scale well for both strength (bs: -4.26 to 2.58) and endurance (bs: -3.86 to 1.79) scales with each item showing adequate fit to the data (all RMSEAs strength) and 93.5% (endurance). Only 2.3 and 1.5% of persons misfit the strength and endurance GRMs, respectively. Conclusion: The MSAS has shown to be a valid tool for measuring MSA behavior in adults using modern psychometric theory.","PeriodicalId":314729,"journal":{"name":"Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences","volume":"92 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/rpbs-7-1-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: With the growing need to promote muscle strengthening activity (MSA) for improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL) comes the growing need for proper measurement of MSA behavior. The purpose of this study was to examine test and item functioning of the MSA scale (MSAS) using item response theory (IRT). Methods: The current research fit data from a sample of N = 400 respondents to two different graded response models (GRMs), a three-item muscular strength scale and a three-item muscular endurance scale. For each GRM, model-data fit was examined and IRT assumptions assessed. Results: An unconstrained GRM was found to fit the data better than the constrained model (Δ G2Strength = 10.3, p = .006, RMSEA = .043 & Δ G2Endurance = 7.0, p = .031, RMSEA = .021). GRM boundary location parameters covered the latent trait scale well for both strength (bs: -4.26 to 2.58) and endurance (bs: -3.86 to 1.79) scales with each item showing adequate fit to the data (all RMSEAs strength) and 93.5% (endurance). Only 2.3 and 1.5% of persons misfit the strength and endurance GRMs, respectively. Conclusion: The MSAS has shown to be a valid tool for measuring MSA behavior in adults using modern psychometric theory.
运用项目反应理论对肌肉强化活动量表(MSAS)进行现代心理测量分析
背景:随着促进肌肉强化活动(MSA)以改善健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的需求日益增长,对MSA行为进行适当测量的需求也日益增长。本研究的目的是运用项目反应理论(IRT)检验MSA量表(MSAS)的测试功能和项目功能。方法:本研究将N = 400名受访者的数据拟合到两种不同的分级反应模型(GRMs)中,即三项肌肉力量量表和三项肌肉耐力量表。对于每个GRM,检查模型数据拟合并评估IRT假设。结果:发现无约束GRM比约束模型更适合数据(Δ G2Strength = 10.3, p = 0.006, RMSEA = 0.043; Δ G2Endurance = 7.0, p = 0.031, RMSEA = 0.021)。GRM边界位置参数覆盖了潜在性状量表的强度(-4.26至2.58)和耐力(-3.86至1.79),每个项目都显示出足够的拟合数据(所有RMSEAs强度)和93.5%(耐力)。只有2.3%和1.5%的人分别不符合力量和耐力GRMs。结论:运用现代心理测量学理论,MSAS是测量成人MSA行为的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信