Assessment of the quality of digital libraries based on the principles of information architecture. Research plan

E. Glowacka
{"title":"Assessment of the quality of digital libraries based on the principles of information architecture. Research plan","authors":"E. Glowacka","doi":"10.1108/dlp-10-2020-0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to present a detailed plan of research on the information architecture of digital library websites.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research plan was prepared on the basis of a critical analysis of the scientific literature concerning the areas and criteria for the analysis and evaluation of the information architecture of digital resources. The evaluation criteria selected in individual areas of information architecture and the entire evaluation model were tested on the example of Europeana. The study proposes criteria for all areas of information architecture: service identity, organizational system, labeling system and navigation system.\n\n\nFindings\nThe proposed research model containing areas and criteria for assessing usefulness from the point of view of information architecture may complement the methodology for assessing digital libraries. In a structured manner, it presents areas important for building good digital resources together with criteria for heuristic evaluation. This thesis is confirmed by a study conducted on the example of Europeana.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nFor a more precise assessment of quality, you can add to the proposed criteria related to the information architecture the criteria proposed by Nielsen or other authors. These include, e.g. help users recognize, diagnose and recover from errors, result relevance, consistency of terminology and specific action conventions and an appropriate visual presentation.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe model can be used to assess the quality of websites of various digital libraries.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe methodology of assessing the quality of digital libraries is in the stage of formation and development. Such studies can apply evaluation criteria prepared to analyze all kinds of information systems and most of all web pages. At the beginning of the 21st century, concepts of using information architecture principles to design and evaluate digital libraries’ usability began to take shape. However, no detailed criteria for evaluating digital libraries based on the principles of information architecture have been presented.\n","PeriodicalId":438470,"journal":{"name":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-10-2020-0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a detailed plan of research on the information architecture of digital library websites. Design/methodology/approach The research plan was prepared on the basis of a critical analysis of the scientific literature concerning the areas and criteria for the analysis and evaluation of the information architecture of digital resources. The evaluation criteria selected in individual areas of information architecture and the entire evaluation model were tested on the example of Europeana. The study proposes criteria for all areas of information architecture: service identity, organizational system, labeling system and navigation system. Findings The proposed research model containing areas and criteria for assessing usefulness from the point of view of information architecture may complement the methodology for assessing digital libraries. In a structured manner, it presents areas important for building good digital resources together with criteria for heuristic evaluation. This thesis is confirmed by a study conducted on the example of Europeana. Research limitations/implications For a more precise assessment of quality, you can add to the proposed criteria related to the information architecture the criteria proposed by Nielsen or other authors. These include, e.g. help users recognize, diagnose and recover from errors, result relevance, consistency of terminology and specific action conventions and an appropriate visual presentation. Practical implications The model can be used to assess the quality of websites of various digital libraries. Originality/value The methodology of assessing the quality of digital libraries is in the stage of formation and development. Such studies can apply evaluation criteria prepared to analyze all kinds of information systems and most of all web pages. At the beginning of the 21st century, concepts of using information architecture principles to design and evaluate digital libraries’ usability began to take shape. However, no detailed criteria for evaluating digital libraries based on the principles of information architecture have been presented.
基于信息体系结构原则的数字图书馆质量评估。研究计划
本文的目的是对数字图书馆网站的信息体系结构进行详细的研究。研究计划是在对科学文献进行批判性分析的基础上制定的,这些文献涉及数字资源信息架构分析和评估的领域和标准。以Europeana为例,对信息架构各个领域所选择的评价标准和整个评价模型进行了测试。该研究为信息架构的所有领域提出了标准:服务标识、组织系统、标签系统和导航系统。所提出的研究模型包含了从信息架构的角度评估有用性的领域和标准,可以补充评估数字图书馆的方法。以结构化的方式,它提出了建立良好数字资源的重要领域,以及启发式评估的标准。以欧洲为例进行的研究证实了这一观点。为了更精确地评估质量,您可以将Nielsen或其他作者提出的标准添加到与信息体系结构相关的建议标准中。这些包括帮助用户识别、诊断错误并从错误中恢复、结果的相关性、术语和具体操作约定的一致性以及适当的视觉呈现。实际意义该模型可用于评估各类数字图书馆网站的质量。数字图书馆质量评价方法正处于形成和发展阶段。这种研究可以应用为分析各种信息系统和大多数网页而准备的评价标准。21世纪初,利用信息架构原理设计和评估数字图书馆可用性的概念开始形成。然而,没有详细的标准来评估基于信息架构的原则的数字图书馆已经提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信