Should Exchanges Allow Larger and More Discounted Placements? An Analysis of Changes to ASX Listing Rules

M. Humphery‐Jenner, Jo‐Ann Suchard
{"title":"Should Exchanges Allow Larger and More Discounted Placements? An Analysis of Changes to ASX Listing Rules","authors":"M. Humphery‐Jenner, Jo‐Ann Suchard","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2443201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the desirability of relaxing constraints on non-pro-rata share issuances and examines amendments to Australian listing rules that have done so. The Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) recently amended its listing rules to allow small-cap companies to issue up to 25% of their share capital at a discount of up to 25% (up from 15% issue at a 15% discount), if the company satisfies certain requirements (including approval of a supermajority of shareholders). The new changes have the potential to distort the shareholder-register. Further, if the equity issue is made to an existing blockholder (or blockholders), the super-majority requirement for the issue to take-place may only require a minority of non-blockholder-shareholders to agree. However, existing directors’ duties and shareholder remedies should be sufficient to protect shareholders from abuse of the new rules. Thus, they could provide additional flexibility to firms who may require significant capital-injections in order to undertake major investments or raise capital to stave-off financial distress.","PeriodicalId":385233,"journal":{"name":"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2443201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyzes the desirability of relaxing constraints on non-pro-rata share issuances and examines amendments to Australian listing rules that have done so. The Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) recently amended its listing rules to allow small-cap companies to issue up to 25% of their share capital at a discount of up to 25% (up from 15% issue at a 15% discount), if the company satisfies certain requirements (including approval of a supermajority of shareholders). The new changes have the potential to distort the shareholder-register. Further, if the equity issue is made to an existing blockholder (or blockholders), the super-majority requirement for the issue to take-place may only require a minority of non-blockholder-shareholders to agree. However, existing directors’ duties and shareholder remedies should be sufficient to protect shareholders from abuse of the new rules. Thus, they could provide additional flexibility to firms who may require significant capital-injections in order to undertake major investments or raise capital to stave-off financial distress.
交易所应该允许更大、更优惠的配售吗?澳大利亚证券交易所上市规则变更分析
本文分析了放宽非按比例股票发行限制的可取性,并考察了澳大利亚上市规则的修订。澳大利亚证券交易所(ASX)最近修改了其上市规则,允许小盘股公司在满足某些要求(包括获得绝对多数股东的批准)的情况下,以最高25%的折扣发行至多25%的股本(高于以15%的折扣发行至多15%的股本)。新的变化有可能扭曲股东登记。此外,如果股权发行是向现有的大股东(或多个大股东)发行,则发行的超级多数要求可能只需要少数非大股东股东同意。然而,现有的董事职责和股东救济应足以保护股东免受新规则的滥用。因此,它们可以为那些可能需要大量注资以进行重大投资或筹集资金以避免财务困境的公司提供额外的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信